OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,924
- Reaction score
- 22,449
But look at the point you made - the 2016 defense was not very good, so the offense had to use ball control to help cover for a bad defense. In other words, the defense was the problem on that team, not the offense.Okay...it's hard to keep track of all the back and retracking from people.
The offense doesn't just score points. Ball control and top are crucial. You criticized the d for 33 points.....but how many 3 and outs? What was top? You can't just throw points around.
I say 2016 was a model for success. So good a rookie could do it. I'm not sure how good the defense really was. And the offense wasn't dynamite and fireworks. But we did know how to control the game through the offense..
Does that mean we can exactly replicate it? Probably not....but we can use that as a model.
It seems a bit odd to blame the offense for losses because it didn't do enough to cover for a bad defense, don't you think?
As for the 2016 model, obviously the team didn't load up on standout receivers to plod along. On the other hand, the top receiver on that 2016 team was a possession receiver (Beasley). And the reality is we don't have the same level of offensive line to control the game with anyway, and the running game has sucked during the recent string of losses, and that's a big blow to the ability to just slow the game down and control the clock.
In any case, even if you blame losses on not using the 2016 model, how is that Dak's fault? It certainly doesn't mean he isn't playing well. It means the offensive approach and offensive personnel is different. Dak may be able to cover for a bad running game or a bad defense, but it's a lot to expect him to cover for both.