I think if people are going to focus on the 52% number, then let's look at it...it is 52% of a really low number...if they have a better DL (in general), then the Hatcher/Ware "replacements" are easier to find
1) Melton MINIMALLY is a as good at applying pressure as Hatcher and is much younger...from a cost perspective, this is a no brainer for the Cowboys; if Melton is healthy, then this move looks to be a big win for the Cowboys for this year and potentially going forward
2) Love Ware, but some times, you have to cut the chord...from a cost perspective, the cut had to happen...saying that we have to replace his #'s and presence brings me humor...his #'s are not going to be difficult to replace since the numbers were not high...he really was scaring no one and he was often covered by one blocker since he didn't have the ability to get to the passer as well as in the past; again, love the guy, and I wish him the best, but he wasn't doing it in Dallas and he was cost-prohibitive for the team...the last thing on him that makes me chuckle to hear from zoners is that Denver knows how to use him? really? how is that again? by making him a part time rusher? by having other guys that can rush the passer? please.....less time getting beaten up is what will make him more productive in his last few years - Dallas could not afford that
3) replacing the 52%? yikes, instead of worrying about those 17 sacks, how about thinking about getting more than the 32 that they had as a team? the way you do that is by having a rotation that will wear (I was gonna say "ware" there, but I digress...) down the other team...no breaks for the opponent; if they can find a bunch of motor guys in their stable of "maybe's", then the team perhaps has more like 40+ sacks....get melton healthy to apply pressure up the middle, when he sits down for a blow, move Crawford inside (he will be on the outside otherwise); a rotation of mostly "b" players is better than one A player (Hatcher) plus one "used to be" A player (Ware) plus a bunch of D players...I will take 6 or 7 "B" players in a rotation any day of the week, and perhaps our new demarcus will have some say in people forgetting the old one
4) this is now Marinelli's baby; I think we may see a different defense this season, not in scheme, but in fire...bringing in all of the "B" and "C" guys will REPLACE all of the "D" and less guys that we trotted on to the field out of necessity
is the team worse? absolutely not...if the team can stay healthy, they are a playoff team, without question...if they have a rash of injuries again, it seems like they have built up enough depth to sustain the team for a short while....Romo is the question mark for the season, although he seems to be ready to go now