What Non-WR 1st pick would upset you?

Jkyle

Well-Known Member
Messages
595
Reaction score
2,191
It's obvious that WR is a priority for the Cowboys.
If Tet or Golden is available at 12 but they decide to go with the another position, what player would upset you if they go a different avenue?
I guess it comes down to which positions are deep and ones they feel they won't have a chance to get in the 2nd or 3rd.
 
Tet at 12 would be upsetting. I could stomach Golden but I’d rather get Williamson from Detroit and look else where with our first pick
 
We may not need to draft this year. Jerry is hard at work on the substantive trades.

#LetJerryCook……#3DChess
 
Running back
Offensive lineman that projects to guard(if staying at 12)
Off ball linebacker. Not sure anyone falls in that criteria, but still.
Raw DE.
 
It's obvious that WR is a priority for the Cowboys.
If Tet or Golden is available at 12 but they decide to go with the another position, what player would upset you if they go a different avenue?
I guess it comes down to which positions are deep and ones they feel they won't have a chance to get in the 2nd or 3rd.
OL unless we trade down in the first and get one in the bottom of the first but not with pick 12
 
IMG_4489.jpeg.8c030f1ec0bfea6e9b22bbcee522feb1.jpeg


I would flip my shift if my team turned the 12th overall pick into a RB or a TE
 
Mykel Williams for me too. I am just scared the Cowboys think he's another D-Law when they used a 2nd last year thinking Kneeland was the same thing.

A CB, WR, or OL should be the pick at 12. If they want a RB or DT in the first they should do whatever necessary to trade down.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,973
Messages
13,841,043
Members
23,783
Latest member
Dstar69
Back
Top