What was worse: 3-13 and 1-15 or 3 5-11 seasons

links18;2129689 said:
13-3 and then one and done in the post-season at home to a team you beat twice in the regular season. That's the worst!!!:banghead:
Not quite.
 
The 3 years of 5-11 was the wrost because we looked like a team with no direction.
 
Doomsday101;2129756 said:
The 3 years of 5-11 was the wrost because we looked like a team with no direction.
Yeah it was almost unreal when we hired Parcells. It was as if we were finally emerging froma dark, dark age.
 
I love my Cowboys!

Therefore,

They are all equally tough......we gotta start winning in the playoffs/sb
 
windward;2129806 said:
Yeah it was almost unreal when we hired Parcells. It was as if we were finally emerging froma dark, dark age.

I agree. I think Parcells coming to Dallas helped get this team back on path. I know BP did not achieve everything we all wanted but I think he was the right man at the right time to help this organization. I think Jerry knew that as well when he hired Parcells.
 
Those 3 straight years of 5-11. About the only good thing was the Cowboy games weren't shown much here so I wasn't always forced to watch. Just remember the numbing feeling & the fear that we were never going to get any better. Our drafts were lousy & we had very few good players--maybe Woodson is all.
 
The campo years were terrible. Jerry's puppet. Nothing good came out of it. We lost alot of games, we lost respectability, we lost honor, we lost alot of things. We gave up 2 first round draft picks for Galloway. The boys were in cap hell that whole time campo was there. I don't think Campo or Jones knew what they were doing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,932
Messages
13,905,890
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top