News: What would a Dez Bryant-less offense look like?

Frozen700

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,512
Reaction score
6,476
VACowboy said:
If he gets $48M/year from us, we'll maybe have TWill and a bunch of scrubs at almost every other positions because we can't afford to pay anybody else. So which does the team more damage: losing Dez or paying him a third of the salary cap?
Click to expand...




Losing Dez does more damage. It will be a huge *** dominio affect. You lose Dez you might as well trade Romo and rebuild.

If we lose Dez we either have to trade for a WR close to his talents or equal(which we won't because we don't even want to pay Dez) so therefore we would have to trade for 2 pretty decent WR's. Which would cost draft picks, because we would not want to trade any of our core guys. To be honest the only guys worth a damn on this team, are Romo, Dez and the O-line. Nobody else holds any real weight.

So that brings me back to trade Romo and rebuild. Why? Because if we lose Dez this year that means we would have to draft a guy, and its rare to hit on moss/odb types in their first year. Most 1st year WR's take about 2-3 years to develop. Romo only has about 2-3 years left.

So we can keep playing Chicken with Dez all we want, but the real harm is being done by the Cowboys.

Either way, Dez will get his money, regardless from us or someone else, whether we like it or not.
 
Last edited:
burmafrd

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
How many SB winners the last ten years have had a top 3 WR on the team?
 
MrPeanutbutter

MrPeanutbutter

What is this, a crossover episode?
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
3,099
Honestly, I'm not worried about next season, but if JJ et al are worried about losing Bryant, they'll draft his replacement with a decently high pick. Wideouts are ungodly replaceable. The Cowboys are offering him almost $13 million per year and Dez wants more than Megatron money. What a joke.
 
MrPeanutbutter

MrPeanutbutter

What is this, a crossover episode?
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
3,099
burmafrd said:
How many SB winners the last ten years have had a top 3 WR on the team?
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I mean, The Cardinals barely lost and had Fitzgerald.

Also, these questions always neglect the fact that Gronkowski is a huge pass receiver.
 
burmafrd

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
kurtatx said:
Yeah, but I mean, The Cardinals barely lost and had Fitzgerald.

Also, these questions always neglect the fact that Gronkowski is a huge pass receiver.
Click to expand...

true but how much difference did he really make in the game? WRs in the SB are not exactly the key players.
 
CF74

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
DFWJC said:
It very well could be that even with him.
Hope not, of course,
Click to expand...

He puts us over the Top, every team has one or two if they are lucky, 3 if they built thru the draft well..
 
Corso

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,769
Reaction score
63,196
AtlCB said:
That was one of the funniest movies I had ever seen.
Click to expand...

cherry-hair-o.gif
 
CF74

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Section444 said:
It would be interesting, as it would be the first time in his career that Romo is without a HoF level WR (for an extended period, assuming he holds out longer than a week or two), it'd give us an opportunity to find out what he's really made of.
Click to expand...

There are a few positives:
1) Romo is healthy again.
2) The coaches have figured out his "Range."
3) Defense is coming together nicely...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top