What would our record be with Bledsoe or Carter?

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,578
Reaction score
6,566
Bledsoe- i think we would finish 8-8

Carter- i think we would be 9-7 or 10-6 maybe

the type of nail bitting games we have had i just don't see any of our past QB's coming close to what Romo can do.

If we didn't have Romo....and you had to choose between Bledsoe or Carter..who would you go with?

I would go with Carter
 
hmm...I would definately rather have Carter. At least he had some mobility.

Bledsoe was just a sack waiting to happen.

Bledsoe: 9-7

Carter: 11-5
 
With either,we'd be lucky to win a playoff game

Carter 8-8
Bledsoe 9-7/10-6
 
I'd say at best both would end up with 8-8. Carter would not be able to make lot of Romo's throws and Bledsoe, well his immobility and INTs/Fumbles would have killed off many of the drives that Romo was able to keep it going with his sheer mobility and improvs.
 
Quincy went 10-6 with Hambrick as his starting RB and a mediocre offensive line.

I think he could have atleast won 11-12 games with this team.

Anyways, who cares, we're 12-1.

:bow:
 
Didnt we see enough of Quincy and Bledsoe? So much so that yo dont have to ask a hypothetical-type question.

They were who we thought they were.... one was not very good and the other was not very bad
 
13-0 no doubt.

We would be on a high with carter the likes of nothing this team has seen all year.
 
windward;1825806 said:
With either,we'd be lucky to win a playoff game

Carter 8-8
Bledsoe 9-7/10-6

Based on comments last year some on this board might still believe Bledsoe is a better QB than Romo!

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
sacowboysfan513;1825801 said:
hmm...I would definately rather have Carter. At least he had some mobility.
Bledsoe was just a sack waiting to happen.

Bledsoe: 9-7

Carter: 11-5

I'd say your smoking some of Q-Bong's best

David
 
I gotta admit, I didn't see this thread coming. Wow.

You got a little Marquis De Sade in ya don't ya???
 
dbair1967;1826000 said:
I'd say your smoking some of Q-Bong's best

David

Like someone said earlier, Carter helped the team to 10 wins without a true running back. I think he would do ok with the offense we have now.

I'm not saying he would get us far in the playoffs but between him and Bledsoe, I would most definitely choose Carter.
 
sacowboysfan513;1826034 said:
Like someone said earlier, Carter helped the team to 10 wins without a true running back. I think he would do ok with the offense we have now.

I'm not saying he would get us far in the playoffs but between him and Bledsoe, I would most definitely choose Carter.

please dont start with this non sense again

1) Carter sux as a QB...we didnt win because of him, we won in spite of him

2) that team in general was a fluke

if he played here now, Garrett would have to really reign in the offense because Q-Bong was so dumb and so inaccurate...we'd get killed throwing as much as we do now with somebody like him trying to throw...we're 12-1 because we have a great QB that runs a great passing game...Carter is not 1/3 the player Romo is, and never would have been

David
 
Terence Newman700;1825792 said:
Bledsoe- i think we would finish 8-8

Carter- i think we would be 9-7 or 10-6 maybe

the type of nail bitting games we have had i just don't see any of our past QB's coming close to what Romo can do.

If we didn't have Romo....and you had to choose between Bledsoe or Carter..who would you go with?

I would go with Carter


Absolutely nowhere close to what it is now!

Quinthy could only read maybe half the field at one time, then he'd throw a kickoff to his receiver.

Bledslaughter, well need I say more about him!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,693
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top