Hoofbite
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,397
- Reaction score
- 10,878
Anyone have any idea what the hell is going on with the PGA and all these players who have been suspended?
As far as I can tell, some of the top golfers have decided to play for another organization at insane amounts of money. I read Phil will receive about $200M going forward and his career tour earnings in the PGA are only half of that as of now. And he's been around for how long?
Saw on ESPN the Roger Goodell of the PGA came on TV and said some canned statements about how the PGA has the best talent in the world (true, but why does that matter?) and players should basically expect a suspension based on previous comments. Not sure what they were, but that's what he said.
Anyway, why is this an issue? The PGA seems to have the approach that they deserve something because they've always had something. They've always been around so that has earned them the right to be the only one on the block.
Personally, I think maybe they should up the stakes a bit. If someone can go to a startup and secure a contract worth 2x what they have made in the past 30 years, why wouldn't they? It's not like there isn't enough money to go around. It's all a matter of who gets it and it seems like the PGA is more interested in being the beneficiary than they are in maintaining some sort of "prestige" or whatever word they want to use in its place.
As far as I can tell, some of the top golfers have decided to play for another organization at insane amounts of money. I read Phil will receive about $200M going forward and his career tour earnings in the PGA are only half of that as of now. And he's been around for how long?
Saw on ESPN the Roger Goodell of the PGA came on TV and said some canned statements about how the PGA has the best talent in the world (true, but why does that matter?) and players should basically expect a suspension based on previous comments. Not sure what they were, but that's what he said.
Anyway, why is this an issue? The PGA seems to have the approach that they deserve something because they've always had something. They've always been around so that has earned them the right to be the only one on the block.
Personally, I think maybe they should up the stakes a bit. If someone can go to a startup and secure a contract worth 2x what they have made in the past 30 years, why wouldn't they? It's not like there isn't enough money to go around. It's all a matter of who gets it and it seems like the PGA is more interested in being the beneficiary than they are in maintaining some sort of "prestige" or whatever word they want to use in its place.