Chuck 54
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,503
- Reaction score
- 12,523
Observations:
1. Almost everyone, fans, media, and football analysts, seem to agree that Dallas has much better personel now than when Parcells took over 3 years ago.
2. On offense, Dallas has had only 1 significant injury the entire year, the one to Flozell Adams. Except for this one injury, Parcells has exactly whom he planned to play on offense (he was never counting on Rogers, not after what he saw last season).
3. On defense, Dallas lost 2 LBs, DAT and Singleton, one considered too small for the 3-4 and the other dismissed by many fans all along as not very good. Some of that has to be offset by the much improved play of Brady James whom no one could have really been counting on due to his poor play since entering the NFL...his play has been a pleasant surprise.
When one looks at the entire team, we've actually remained fairly healthy on offense and lost a couple of LBs whom many thought could be replaced by Shanle and Burnett without much harm...we also added Fujita as a starter.
So here are the questions: What's wrong with the Cowboys? Why are we so bad suddenly? Who's fault is it ultimately?
What's wrong with the Cowboys? Did losing 1 OT totally put our entire offense in the crapper? Is Parcells and his coaching staff blameless? Isn't he responsible for the OL players we went into the season with? Isn't someone responsible for coaching and scheming well enough to cover for the loss of 1 somewhat underachieving Flozell Adams? If LBs are the main problem with the defense, then why are we playing the 3-4 which is designed to work with superior LBs and less talented DL? If our DL players are so much better than our LBs, then why aren't we putting 4 of them on the field more?
Why are we so bad suddenly? I can understand why we're 5 point underdogs to Carolina. But why are we being given almost "0" chance of making the playoffs by football analysts? Why are the Commanders considered to have the best shot of any 10-6 team of taking a wild card? Why are the Commanders favored by 3 against the 10-4 Giants? I'm a little shocked. If we finish the season behind the Giants and the Commanders, are we suddenly and disappointingly the worst team in the NFC East going into next year? I ask this because the Eagles only have to add a healthy RB and a WR to once again have the most talented offense in the division next year when McNabb is healthy again.
Who's fault is it ultimately? We may win out and make the playoffs and go further in the playoffs than the Giants, in which case we're suddenly talking about the Cowboys and how good they can be next year. But, realistically, let's go with the so-called experts who say we aren't going to the playoffs, that we are fading fast. Who's to blame? Is the total collapse of the defense the fault of injuries to DAT and Singleton of all people? Were they that good? Is the collapse of the offense all due to the injury to Adams, the only injury on offense this year? If he was still on the field, would we suddenly be running the ball down people's throats and protecting Bledsoe into a ProBowl birth?
If this team is indeed better than in recent years...if the personel is so much better, then isn't it up to the coaches to get results? Or have we improved, yet watched the Skins and Giants get even better to the point we have lost ground on the entire division?
I want to believe we have the talent...I want to believe we're only 2-3 players away from being a favored team in the NFC. But if that's true, how have we allowed the Skins with Brunnell at QB and only 1 WR on offense and a defense with no DL and a totally battered secondary, along with the Giants who have an inconsistant QB throwing to Plaxico and Shockey and a suspect secondary to both finish ahead of us? Isn't someone to blame?
Are all of our woes to be excused with no blame to anyone based on the single injury to Flozell Adams?
Talk to me...While you're at it, tell me how Bledsoe and Witten should make the ProBowl but didn't because it's a popularity contest: Brunnell has a higher rating than Bledsoe right now...Bledsoe is #5 in the NFC, so don't give me the stats excuse. Crumpler and Shockey are both having huge years that overshadow anything on Witten...how many TE's do you want at the ProBowl? And explain to me how Cooley of the Commanders is a #1 alternate. Surely he isn't more popular than Witten...he had to make it on players and coaches ballots, I would think.
Something's wrong in Dallas....who has the answers.
1. Almost everyone, fans, media, and football analysts, seem to agree that Dallas has much better personel now than when Parcells took over 3 years ago.
2. On offense, Dallas has had only 1 significant injury the entire year, the one to Flozell Adams. Except for this one injury, Parcells has exactly whom he planned to play on offense (he was never counting on Rogers, not after what he saw last season).
3. On defense, Dallas lost 2 LBs, DAT and Singleton, one considered too small for the 3-4 and the other dismissed by many fans all along as not very good. Some of that has to be offset by the much improved play of Brady James whom no one could have really been counting on due to his poor play since entering the NFL...his play has been a pleasant surprise.
When one looks at the entire team, we've actually remained fairly healthy on offense and lost a couple of LBs whom many thought could be replaced by Shanle and Burnett without much harm...we also added Fujita as a starter.
So here are the questions: What's wrong with the Cowboys? Why are we so bad suddenly? Who's fault is it ultimately?
What's wrong with the Cowboys? Did losing 1 OT totally put our entire offense in the crapper? Is Parcells and his coaching staff blameless? Isn't he responsible for the OL players we went into the season with? Isn't someone responsible for coaching and scheming well enough to cover for the loss of 1 somewhat underachieving Flozell Adams? If LBs are the main problem with the defense, then why are we playing the 3-4 which is designed to work with superior LBs and less talented DL? If our DL players are so much better than our LBs, then why aren't we putting 4 of them on the field more?
Why are we so bad suddenly? I can understand why we're 5 point underdogs to Carolina. But why are we being given almost "0" chance of making the playoffs by football analysts? Why are the Commanders considered to have the best shot of any 10-6 team of taking a wild card? Why are the Commanders favored by 3 against the 10-4 Giants? I'm a little shocked. If we finish the season behind the Giants and the Commanders, are we suddenly and disappointingly the worst team in the NFC East going into next year? I ask this because the Eagles only have to add a healthy RB and a WR to once again have the most talented offense in the division next year when McNabb is healthy again.
Who's fault is it ultimately? We may win out and make the playoffs and go further in the playoffs than the Giants, in which case we're suddenly talking about the Cowboys and how good they can be next year. But, realistically, let's go with the so-called experts who say we aren't going to the playoffs, that we are fading fast. Who's to blame? Is the total collapse of the defense the fault of injuries to DAT and Singleton of all people? Were they that good? Is the collapse of the offense all due to the injury to Adams, the only injury on offense this year? If he was still on the field, would we suddenly be running the ball down people's throats and protecting Bledsoe into a ProBowl birth?
If this team is indeed better than in recent years...if the personel is so much better, then isn't it up to the coaches to get results? Or have we improved, yet watched the Skins and Giants get even better to the point we have lost ground on the entire division?
I want to believe we have the talent...I want to believe we're only 2-3 players away from being a favored team in the NFC. But if that's true, how have we allowed the Skins with Brunnell at QB and only 1 WR on offense and a defense with no DL and a totally battered secondary, along with the Giants who have an inconsistant QB throwing to Plaxico and Shockey and a suspect secondary to both finish ahead of us? Isn't someone to blame?
Are all of our woes to be excused with no blame to anyone based on the single injury to Flozell Adams?
Talk to me...While you're at it, tell me how Bledsoe and Witten should make the ProBowl but didn't because it's a popularity contest: Brunnell has a higher rating than Bledsoe right now...Bledsoe is #5 in the NFC, so don't give me the stats excuse. Crumpler and Shockey are both having huge years that overshadow anything on Witten...how many TE's do you want at the ProBowl? And explain to me how Cooley of the Commanders is a #1 alternate. Surely he isn't more popular than Witten...he had to make it on players and coaches ballots, I would think.
Something's wrong in Dallas....who has the answers.