chuffly
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,079
- Reaction score
- 115
DIAF;3210044 said:So, what you are saying is posters on this board are bending the meaning of the term "anomaly" to fit their argument?
Nope. I'll go ahead and explain I suppose.
When making a statistical inference, you need a large enough sample size or the conclusions you make can be flawed. With a limited sample space, you are much more likely to end up with a statistical anomaly that you are trying to draw inferences from which can make for a flawed conclusion. What you are doing here is making an inference that Romo is a choker when it counts. Theo is simply pointing out (and I agree) that you don't have enough information to make that claim and what you may be pointing out could very well be an anomaly. This DOES NOT mean that theo is saying that Romo is an amazing December player, just that we can't make the conclusion that Romo is unable to play in big games from the information given.
And given that Romo just won December player of the month, I'm quite comfortable sticking with this premise (which was my premise all along way back in September).