Where do you rank this O-line as of now?

gdogg24

Well-Known Member
Messages
842
Reaction score
393
Waters signing makes us better not just because he's potentially our best guard but also because he turns Berny into depth. He would have been serviceable as a starter and I think he'll play well Sunday but now he's gone from serviceable starter to great backup. We can carry two O-linemen as depth to the game and re-enforce all five spots. So say Waters is just good enough to be the clear cut best guard on this team maybe not a pro-bowler but definitely the best we've had at the position for a few seasons. Would say the Cowboys have the best O-line in the division? Considering depth and all that. Beyond that where do you think this unit is compared to the rest of the league? I'm personally excited with the potential this unit has mainly because it's been a bit of let down in recent years to say the least.
 
As of right now, #2 (on paper). Hard to put them by a WSH line that has proven continuity. I think we have a great balance of brute smash mouth capabilities in the run game and that's all I've wanted for 3-4 years. So I'm happy.
 
Slightly above average and good enough...
 
I'd like to see all the new starters in games that count before I start ranking them next to lines that outperformed them by a significant margin last season. I do think this OL is good enough for the offense to pass the ball effectively, which is great. We were before, though, too. Now, however, we also upgraded the RG spot and now have a legitimate top-8 OLs who can all play at a relatively high level in this league. And we've got enough competition that it keeps all of them on their toes. That bodes well for the long season ahead.
 
If 1993's line is a 10 and last year's line is a 1, I'd give this year's line a 5 with a chance to go as high as a 6.5.
 
We can get by with an average line with all our star players.

And we likely won't be far from average. Top 8? I cannot see any possibility of that happening. None.

The good?
1. We are improved, esp. at center.
2. Waters knows how to play the game
3. We've got a bit more depth entering the season than last year.
4. We likely will have a smarter line

The bad?
1. We are relying on two new guys
2. We are counting on a 36 year-old who hasn't practiced a single down.
3. There is very little continuity
4. Doug Free was horrific last season. Will he really have improved much?
5. Leary's knees
 
too hard to tell just yet...on paper, the unit looks pretty good...but until we see if Fred can continue his growth AND can Leary play every game AND can Waters be effective at 36 years old, then I will reserve judgment

I am very optimistic at the moment
 
I'd say top 10-12 at the very least with potential to be top 5. Lots of talent with the starters as well as quality depth behind them. Props to the FO for solidifying the biggest weakness of the team!
 
As many are saying, I expect the line to be better this year but only time shall tell. When JPP n Justin Tuck unleash this Sunday lets see what they got! Can't wait!!!!!
 
And we likely won't be far from average. Top 8? I cannot see any possibility of that happening. None.

The good?
1. We are improved, esp. at center.
2. Waters knows how to play the game
3. We've got a bit more depth entering the season than last year.
4. We likely will have a smarter line

The bad?
1. We are relying on two new guys
2. We are counting on a 36 year-old who hasn't practiced a single down.
3. There is very little continuity
4. Doug Free was horrific last season. Will he really have improved much?
5. Leary's knees

Can't say it any better
This line has a chance to be good but we need to see them play together consistently to know
 
It has the potential to be a top 10 line. It will, at the very least, be above average IMO.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,635
Messages
14,549,010
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top