The Garrett fanboys say that, but they actually don't want another coach because they're afraid the team would perform better and their red hero would be exposed.
This thread is a real blast from the past watching the Garrett fans do back bends to explain his mediocrity. The team he was a part of was so insanely talented even the worst coach ever could make the playoffs with it... until Garrett took over. Then overnight it became a no-talent wreck requiring a near-decade-long rebuild. Poor, poor Jason had it so badly here with Romo and Witten and Ware and Lee and others. LOL.
I do love that the wunderkind has won as many playoff games in seven years as the horrible coach did in three. But wunderkind is still great and we're so lucky to have him. Again, LOL.
This is total nonsense, CL.
The 2010 team he took over was 1-7. There's no dressing up that pig. And he started the OL overhaul immediately in that next offseason. And every NFL team has good players on it. That's not how you measure a good team. You measure a good team by how many holes its got, and the 2010-2012 teams had a lot of holes.
The weakest thing you're saying here is that any of us wouldn't want an improvement over Garrett if he's replaced at HC. That's just a really dumb argument to try to make. For one, if Garrett were replaced next week, I can tell you right now I'm still not going to agree that he wasn't a good coach in Dallas. I'm going to say he's a guy who put together a couple of teams that were contenders, but he didn't get it done. I'm not going to suddenly reverse position and agree that he's secretly been a bad coach all along.
Secondly, there's not a person in the organization I wouldn't want to see replaced in a heartbeat by a more talented alternative. Just because you think a coach is doing a good job, it doesn't mean there aren't better options out there.
This is the sort of irrational take that makes seriously discussion the topic of coaching in Dallas pointless.