Who should Garrett hire as a OC next season?

Hostile;4295714 said:
Real simple, in the real world is he going to hire an OC just to appease the fans and media? Or is he going to continue to act as both just like other team's head coaches do?

If we're all about objectivity and realism now CL, how about we actually practice it?

The problem is Hos that Garrett apparently cant handle doing both. He said himself that learning how to manage a game (i.e. when to call timeouts, when to challenge, ect...) was the biggest challenge in going from OC to HC.


It is very apparent that Garrett cannot do both "effectively". That is the key here, sure he can do both but if it starts hurting the team because he is spread too thin then things need to change.

This is actually for Garrett's own good because if he keeps blowing games at the current rate then he will be gone from Big D very quickly.
 
Beast_from_East;4295734 said:
The problem is Hos that Garrett apparently cant handle doing both. He said himself that learning how to manage a game (i.e. when to call timeouts, when to challenge, ect...) was the biggest challenge in going from OC to HC.


It is very apparent that Garrett cannot do both "effectively". That is the key here, sure he can do both but if it starts hurting the team because he is spread too thin then things need to change.

This is actually for Garrett's own good because if he keeps blowing games at the current rate then he will be gone from Big D very quickly.
He's handling it quite well from where I sit.
 
ringmaster;4295472 said:
I know that JG is a good offensive coach and if he doesn't bring in a OC next year that will be fine with me.

I'm not suggesting it but it either but most fans here are up in arms about after that freak loss to the Cards this past Sunday.

Ring, man.. its not that it wouldnt' be a good idea for him to hire an OC next year, its that he isn't going to. He doesn't want to. He thinks he can handle it. So discussing who he should hire is a moot point, because its not going to happen.
 
RoyTheHammer;4295737 said:
Ring, man.. its not that it wouldnt' be a good idea for him to hire an OC next year, its that he isn't going to. He doesn't want to. He thinks he can handle it. So discussing who he should hire is a moot point, because its not going to happen.
Bingo.
 
Hostile;4295741 said:

Yes, sir.

That being said, i hope someone is able to convince him to, because i think alot of us would agree that it would be a good idea at this stage of JG's coaching career. Its not easy at all to do both, especially for a very young head coach with not many years of experience. It could only help to have another guy there to take some of the pressure off while JG is still learning things.
 
Beast_from_East;4295747 said:
7-5 with 3 losses directly due to his errors.


From where I sit he needs some help.

Somebody change the record.. please. :rolleyes:
 
Beast_from_East;4295747 said:
7-5 with 3 losses directly due to his errors.


From where I sit he needs some help.

3 losses were contributed to by his errors, but it's false to say his errors were THE thing that cost each game.
 
Stautner;4295752 said:
3 losses were contributed to by his errors, but it's false to say his errors were THE thing that cost each game.

That's better. :cool:
 
Beast_from_East;4295747 said:
7-5 with 3 losses directly due to his errors.


From where I sit he needs some help.
1st place in the NFC East and the post season.

Watch how we close out this regular season before you get your pitchfork tuned up and light your torches.
 
RoyTheHammer;4295750 said:
Yes, sir.

That being said, i hope someone is able to convince him to, because i think alot of us would agree that it would be a good idea at this stage of JG's coaching career. Its not easy at all to do both, especially for a very young head coach with not many years of experience. It could only help to have another guy there to take some of the pressure off while JG is still learning things.
Hey, tell the truth here.

Was I not among the loudest voices for Paul Chryst on this site?

I'm not opposed to an OC here. I am opposed to fantasy.
 
Hostile;4295766 said:
Hey, tell the truth here.

Was I not among the loudest voice for Paul Chryst on this site?

I'm not opposed to an OC here. I am opposed to fantasy.

I wasn't implying that you didn't agree.. i simply said most of us agree that it would be a good idea to bring in an OC next year. My bad.
 
Hostile;4295714 said:
Real simple, in the real world is he going to hire an OC just to appease the fans and media?
He does it with his playcalling...

First we have Detroit, then we have NE.
 
Hostile;4295766 said:
Hey, tell the truth here.

Was I not among the loudest voice for Paul Chryst on this site?

I'm not opposed to an OC here. I am opposed to fantasy.

Why were you so insistent that Chryst was coming here if Garrett was never going to hire an OC anyway?

And of course he wouldn't hire an OC to appease fans. He would do it to improve the team, same way that Andy Reid did.
 
Chocolate Lab;4295788 said:
Why were you so insistent that Chryst was coming here if Garrett was never going to hire an OC anyway?

In no way can I speak for Hostile, just thought I would jump in and give you what I know about the situation.

Fact is.........Garrett was interested in bringing in Chryst as an offensive coordinator. But Garrett wanted to retain play calling duties. That right there is the real rub. No way, NO HOW is Chryst coming to Dallas to just sit in the background and help devise schemes and gameplans. Not happening in this lifetime. Chryst is a playcaller first and foremost.

No playcalling= No Chryst. Just that simple.


For the record, I dont believe your ever going to get a BIGTIME O.C thats worth a dang to come to Dallas if you dont also include playcalling duties. Its what they do.
 
My vote's for Sparano to come in. Though I don't think JG gives up play calling responsibilities. Nor do I think Jerry wants him to, which is an even better reason for it not happening.
 
RoyTheHammer;4295737 said:
Ring, man.. its not that it wouldnt' be a good idea for him to hire an OC next year, its that he isn't going to. He doesn't want to. He thinks he can handle it. So discussing who he should hire is a moot point, because its not going to happen.

Not sure, but I thought message boards were created for the sake of discussion. Seriously, just b/c Garrett stated that he would not heed Jimmy and hire a OC does not mean the topic is moot.

Garrett may think it is, but ultimately, it is Jerry's call. And the man did not look pleased during the Cardinals' game. And that was not the first time he looked/acted peeved this season. Second guessing Jason in his rookie HC season started with Jerry.
 
cowboyschmps3;4295813 said:
Sparano can be an online if Hudson Houck leaves, Norv OC

Interesting thought... Sparano OL + OC ....net zero cost (get d of Houck). I think that he'd do well with one or two more competent linemen, and not be a threat to Jason.
 
BAT;4295946 said:
Not sure, but I thought message boards were created for the sake of discussion. Seriously, just b/c Garrett stated that he would not heed Jimmy and hire a OC does not mean the topic is moot.

Garrett may think it is, but ultimately, it is Jerry's call. And the man did not look pleased during the Cardinals' game. And that was not the first time he looked/acted peeved this season. Second guessing Jason in his rookie HC season started with Jerry.

Message boards are most certainly created for the sake of discussion. That's why i gave my view on the topic of why this particular subject is a moot point.. because i don't see it happening. If you disagree with anything i said, you're certainly welcome to add your opinion to the mix as you've done here.

Like you said, that's what message boards are for. ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,635
Messages
14,548,990
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top