Who W/ #18

[bobbie brewskie]

if they are all available who do you say we pick with #18?

 

[dbair1967]

honestly, none of them...I'd rather trade down

and there is no way I am picking Jimmy Williams at 18, or any other point in rd one...he has bust written all over him on top of the punk attitude rep

David

 

[Paniolo22]

honestly, none of them...I'd rather trade down

and there is no way I am picking Jimmy Williams at 18, or any other point in rd one...he has bust written all over him on top of the punk attitude rep

David

Agreed here. It would have to be between Lawson and Carpenter, but we really need to trade down. Too much value in the middle rounds.

 

[peppersquad]

The word on the inner net street is Mr. Williams is a pot head, but who among isn't wasn't at that age.

 

[silver]

none. santonio holmes. offense offense offense.

 

[bobbie brewskie]

none. santonio holmes. offense offense offense.

santonio holmes is not much better than what we could get in round 2, why waste a 1st rounder on a #4 WR in a weak WR class?

as for the option of trading down, this would entirely change the scenario, so thats why i didnt add it as an option.

 

[MiStar]

If anybody cared to watch, Eric Winston was terrible this past year. Why anybody thinks that 40 times are important in determining NFL talent for an offensive lineman is beyond me.

 

[D41lasCowboys31]

Marcus McNeil

 

[big dog cowboy]

All these polls should always include TRADE DOWN as an option. I don't want any of those guys at 18.

 

[Teague31]

i posted this in another thread but will say it again- i think it will be very hard to trade down in this draft- everyone is wanting to do it and if no one wants to trade up then we are not going down. my money says we pick at 18. i also think lawson is long gone- either to cleveland or miami.