Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
63 votes for Romo.
2 votes for Dak.
Debate SETTLED.
2 votes for Dak.
Debate SETTLED.
Poll above...
1. He was an all-pro, too1. Zack Martin
2. Tyron Smith
How someone could vote for Romo idk. Guy was good at his positionbut to compare him to AllPro players is just unfair to him.
Other than Zeke, he has played the fewest years and games of anyone on the list.Dak has 2 votes
Hes played exactly 8 games less than Romo in the 2010sOther than Zeke, he has played the fewest years and games of anyone on the list.
Yup.As much as he drove me nuts it has to be Romo
not because I think he kept us relevant because he had help with that unlike many who refuse to acknowledge I get that’s it a team game
but because he worked hard on his craft and got better every year and despite having a horrible coach persevered and put up good numbers in a passing league and Dallas has chances
they just didn’t get it done
Tyron Smith.Poll above...
1. He was an all-pro, too
2. He played in an era with 4 of the top 10 QBs of all-time (Brady, Manning, Brees, Rodgers). How many All-pros would Martin and Tyron get if Johnathan Ogden and Larry Allen played in their era?
Romo is not a HOF'r. As a player he got way more hype than deserved. This argument has been played out numerous times.Yup.
As much as folks want to say Tyron and Zack are shoe-ins for the HOF, Romo would be too if the team had more post-season success. He was that good. Its sad that QBs are judged differently...
1. He had more than one or two great seasonsYou dont want to compare a player who had essentially one or twos great season to players who perform on all pro levels year in and out, do you ?
Romo is not a HOF'r. As a player he got way more hype than deserved. This argument has been played out numerous times.
Romo a good player when you need your QB to be great