1. He was an all-pro, too
2. He played in an era with 4 of the top 10 QBs of all-time (Brady, Manning, Brees, Rodgers). How many All-pros would Martin and Tyron get if Johnathan Ogden and Larry Allen played in their era?
Ware only had 3 healthy seasons for the cowboys in the 2010s and last top season for them was 2012. Why would he made a 2010s cowboys all-decade list ?
Agreed. I think there interchangable to be honest (could pick either).
Tyron played more games and played a harder position. Martin though despite playing 3 lesson seasons actually has just as good if not better accolades (Zack has 6 total all-pro team selections vs 4 of Tyrons and both made the all-decade team).
I"m still shocked that Romo is winning this. No way.Tony Romo played seven seasons in the 2010's and in three of them he missed about 3/4 of the season.
Therefore, he really only played in four of the ten seasons. In three of those seasons the Cowboys went 8-8.
Tony was a Pro Bowl selection only once in the 2010's.
If you were to use the seasons from 2006 to 2015 then by all means, I support him being a very strong candidate, probably the winner, but not 2010 to 2019.
And by such a large margin. You can add Tyron, Martin, Fred Beard and Zeke's votes together and Romo would still win.I"m still shocked that Romo is winning this. No way.
1. He had more than one or two great seasons
2. You obviously didnt read/understand my post. He wouldve been all pro year in and out if he didnt play in an era with the greatest of all time. Btw, Tyron hasnt been an all-pro since 2016. Romo has the same amount of all-pros as Roger..
I placed Martin for a reason and not Smith. Still Smith was and is still better at his position then Romo was.
Romo had essemtially one great year. And that because of the greatest supporting cast he ever had in his career. I gave you 2 just because i did not want to argue. Overall Romo was a good QB but should not be compared to great players at their position.
Romo had great competition in his time, but that does not make him better. If he had good competition he would not have made the all pro level anyways.
Last but not least please dont question my intellect. I am far more intelligent then you.
I agree.1. Zack Martin
2. Tyron Smith
How someone could vote for Romo idk. Guy was good at his positionbut to compare him to AllPro players is just unfair to him.
Came down to Ware or Frederick on the poll.
Went w Frederick based on longevity.
Zack Martin, Tyron Smith and Jason Witten are the only certain HOFers on that list imo, but Zack has more individual accomplishments. I don’t think it’s up for debate imo.
Tyron Smith is not going to the HOF.
I agree.
Martin - 6 X All pro > Smith - 4 X All pro. Romo was All pro one time and that was on the second team.
That might be a stretch.Tyron Smith is not going to the HOF.