4lifecowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,713
- Reaction score
- 2,534
Roy Williams in his first few years.
It's a process.Michael Irvin and Woody.. We still havent found their replacements
Emmitt Smith. Forced to play with the Cardinals, because Dallas went with Hambrick.
Romo is definitely tough because i thought we were really close to putting the team around him to give him a chance.
I'll go a little old school on you though. Tony Dorsett. He was the man for so many years & probably because of my youth wasn't prepared not to see him on the field.
I’d agree!Jimmy Johnson.
I would have said Tom Landry, but Landry should have retired on a high note, long before Jerry fired him. If Landry was in the prime of his career and let go, then I'd say him because he was an innovator.
Again, you sound like a deranged loony desperate to validate Dak's horrible season. Nobody cares to read your vapid takes on football, or your ridiculous attempts to tell the future. If you want to be helpful, at least look in the future and get the lottery numbers. That way there is at least a tiny chance you could be right.You could count on Romo being hurt. Just like you can count on Sean Lee being hurt. Dak took hits this year that would have landed Romo in the ER. So please spare me the "dak sloberer" title and come back to reality where Romo's body gave up on him and let him down, most likely because we waited way to long to protect him and allowed him to run for his life for the better part of a decade of his career. Just because I say Romo would get hurt doesn't mean I don't appreciate what he did for this organization. Its just irritating that people say "oh if he came back" bla bla. The injury he sustained in the pre season took him out for the better part of 3 months and it was a nothing hit. Imagine Romo taking the hits Dak did this year, or even last year. He would have died. So just stop it already you sound like the lunatic here not me
OMG you need to stop. Romo wouldn't have lasted thru a full game coming back. He could barely make it thru a quarter of pre-season. You want the guy in a wheelchair? Romo wouldn't have led us anywhere because Dak would have been QB again very quickly when Romo went down, and the backlash of taking out a guy who was 11-1 when Romo came back would have ruined all team chemistry.
If you want to be helpful stop pretending Romo wouldn't get hurt ever again. I am going based on his history. You are telling me I am wrong. Who's taking more of a leap? I am not trying to validate Dak's season at all. Just pointing out the obvious that Romo wasn't even on the roster.Again, you sound like a deranged loony desperate to validate Dak's horrible season. Nobody cares to read your vapid takes on football, or your ridiculous attempts to tell the future. If you want to be helpful, at least look in the future and get the lottery numbers. That way there is at least a tiny chance you could be right.
It did. Too the playoffs, and if not for a freak play by the best QB in football after a blatant hold would have taken us to a NFCCG. So please just stop. Dak did his part in that game. We didn't use Zeke the way we should have after resting him and taking the cowards approach in the last game of the year.That 'team chemistry' sure carried us far.
It did. Too the playoffs, and if not for a freak play by the best QB in football after a blatant hold would have taken us to a NFCCG. So please just stop. Dak did his part in that game. We didn't use Zeke the way we should have after resting him and taking the cowards approach in the last game of the year.
Not what I am saying at all. What I am saying is looking at history, the better player wouldn't have been in the game long enough to matter. Chances are he would of been out, and we would have brought Dak back in anyways. That's all I am saying.So your stance is actually that an 11 - 1 team could not go on to make the playoffs if they had put the better player back in when he got healthy? Sure, that sounds reasonable.