Who will we draft at 10?

[CouchCoach]

Question to ask before this one is will they pick at 10?

 

[tyke1doe]

Pitts is an elite talent that many believe is going to be a day 1 star. Talked about in the same breath as Kelce. You really think Jerry is going to take a corner if Pitts is on the board ?

 

[J-man]

Barring any trades, I have a feeling it will be Slater because I believe they will have him rated a good bit higher than Surtain.
I think Farley will go to Denver (if not sooner). If Farley is there he is the probable pick.

If they stick to a pure BPA board it could be Pitts. But I honestly don't think he gets passed Detroit now that they have Goff, they could also take Farley or Slater at 7. And in that happens we could get "stuck" with Pitts at 10.

IMHO, Parsons is too much of a ? and an off ball LB doesn't offer good value at 10. Paye isn't what we need and DE isn't a huge need either.

 

[tyke1doe]

I think it will be a trade down. We need serious help on the defensive side of the ball and at OT.
Barring a trade, it will be ... Pitts.
Surtain and Farley have question marks. Pitts has none.
I said it will be Pitts and then defense will get the benefit of most of the picks thereafter.
You know what Jerry i$ $eeing? CeeDee, Cooper and Pitts - Oh My!
Consider Pitts another gift to Dak.

 

[morasp]

A trade down could allow them to get a starting quality OT, S, and CB

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Hate to be that dude, but this is like the 300th version of the same thread.

 

[atlantacowboy]

Better not be that short armed tackle at Northwestern. We need defense or a QB.

Mahomes was taken 10th. So this could be a valuable pick for a team needing a QB. Buffalo got 2 firsts and a 3rd for trading the 10th pick in the 2017 draft to KC. If we sign Dak, we should absolutely try and trade this pick.

 

[Rayman70]

Pitts or Parsons. Wouldn't be my choice, but its what I think they will do. IMO, I would LOVE to see a trade down because we need picks/bodies. The D need at least 3 heavy contributors out of the gate.

 

[Rayman70]

Better not be that short armed tackle at Northwestern. We need defense or a QB.

Mahomes was taken 10th. So this could be a valuable pick for a team needing a QB. Buffalo got 2 firsts and a 3rd for trading the 10th pick in the 2017 draft to KC. If we sign Dak, we should absolutely try and trade this pick.

good point on QB. Many don't wanna admit that. QB is a real possibility if we tag or trade Dak. Its reality.

 

[atlantacowboy]

good point on QB. Many don't wanna admit that. QB is a real possibility if we tag or trade Dak. Its reality.

The more I look at this draft, most all of the value is at QB and WR. Their isn't a DL or OL worth the 10 pick. Maybe if Surtain falls, he would be a good pick.......doubt he falls.

 

[DFWJC]

My top 5 are Lawrence, Sewell, Chase, Wilson, and Pitts. Anyone of these guys available then that’s the pick.
My next 5 are Smith,Parsons,Surtain,Farley, and Waddle.
I’m ecstatic if I can get someone from the top 5.But happy to get any of the 10.

You would draft a 4th WR?
I think if WR is alone at the top your board at 10, you absolutely have to trade down....unless you have a trade in place for Cooper or Gallup.

 

[bodi]

cb

just say no to Slater or pitts

trade back

 

[chagus]

I want O-line help so id go with Slater. Learn from last seasons fiasco at OL.

 

[DFWJC]

The more I look at this draft, most all of the value is at QB and WR. Their isn't a DL or OL worth the 10 pick. Maybe if Surtain falls, he would be a good pick.......doubt he falls.

Sewell would be worth it

 

[atlantacowboy]

Sewell would be worth it

Sewell is not falling out of the top 5. He is the only sure thing at tackle in this draft.

 

[Doomsday101]

I think if we stay at 10 it will be CB with either Surtain or Farley. I think it is just as likely that Cowboys move out of 10 picking up extra pick and get DT later in the 1st rd.