Why did the D play so much Zone?

Brooksey

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,132
Reaction score
7,635
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Why did they play so much Zone? Cowboys are a man team. Love feasted vs zone coverage this year and was mortal vs man.

I never heard an explanation. Makes no sense.
Not only did he play a soft zone but he never went to the cover one, heavy pressure scheme that defines the football team.
 

Alweezy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
1,039
Then explain this to me. How come our zones left WRs wide open all the time but their zone defense allowed 2-3 guys to be around the receiver almost every time?
I think some of that is the fact that Dak began forcing the ball.
 

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,856
Reaction score
18,176
In man, GBay goes 4 wide, in the box hard to get enough guys to stop run.

They were gashing our run D hard..
Jeez, I wonder how long the problem of not being able to stop the run has been around. Will it be addressed this offseason? My money is on no. After all we drafted Mazi Smith and we are smarter than everyone else and evaluate talent better than anyone else....Will McClay...Will McClay fans...
 

Cowboy_svt

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
3,031
Pretty incredible im actually seeing DQ be worse than Rob Ryan with confusing his own damn defense and trying to outsmart everyone but the other team.
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,385
Reaction score
19,482
In man, GBay goes 4 wide, in the box hard to get enough guys to stop run.

They were gashing our run D hard..
This is my thinking too. Quinn was afraid that if his DBs were in man with their backs to the LOS the Packers would run all over us.

I see the logic, but when we were leaving receivers wide open all night for big gains, and especially on 3rd and long, why stay in zone?
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,174
Reaction score
4,366
This is my thinking too. Quinn was afraid that if his DBs were in man with their backs to the LOS the Packers would run all over us.

I see the logic, but when we were leaving receivers wide open all night for big gains, and especially on 3rd and long, why stay in zone?
I think we miss Malik Hooker more than realize. He could see things develop better than in the box hit men Kearse anx Wilson
 

Cydios

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,013
Reaction score
7,117
Why did they play so much Zone? Cowboys are a man team. Love feasted vs zone coverage this year and was mortal vs man.

I never heard an explanation. Makes no sense.
Because they're getting burned when going man, and it supposed to conserve their fuel a bit. Problem is, Dallas doesn't play zone well at all.
 

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,504
Reaction score
64,329
Quinn got cute and tried to outsmart the opponent. Instead he outsmarted himself.

Huge fail. Pathetic.
 

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,521
Reaction score
5,159
Why did they play so much Zone? Cowboys are a man team. Love feasted vs zone coverage this year and was mortal vs man.

I never heard an explanation. Makes no sense.
I think they were really worried about Green Bays ability to run the football.

But i was shaking my head too. Guys were so open in the middle and our pass rush was bearly existent.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
41,737
Reaction score
28,515
Why did they play so much Zone? Cowboys are a man team. Love feasted vs zone coverage this year and was mortal vs man.

I never heard an explanation. Makes no sense.
Actually the rumor is or at least people speculation is because of gilmore's shoulder injury I even believe Lewis got a Ding shoulder in the game against Washington they decided not to put it on man to man because they may not have been tackling well so they went to more zone and I also heard that Green Bay was really good against man or at least that may have heard that wrong so they decided this might have been the best way to go about it which was a complete bust it was one of the worst displays of playoff defense I've ever seen anybody who starts blaming this offense is probably gonna all get put on ignored I realize the offense wasn't good but when they feel like they need to score 40 to win and start forcing the football and changing the game plan on offense to desperation time like in Seattle and a lot of other games this year where the defense didn't even offer much resistance..
 

Bardley1985

Active Member
Messages
88
Reaction score
138
It was like 3rd and 3 and Dan had the DBs back 10 yards. I was just cracking up! Just glad we lost early so I could just accept it early … the team was off for sure… no energy and nobody wanted to play besides Rico, Ferg & Gallup. Defense was lame **. It’s like they knew Dan is gone
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
41,737
Reaction score
28,515
I think we miss Malik Hooker more than realize. He could see things develop better than in the box hit men Kearse anx Wilson
Malik hooker didn't play?? since when?? maybe I missed it cause I was so angry I couldn't see through the fog in my eyes.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
41,737
Reaction score
28,515
It was like 3rd and 3 and Dan had the DBs back 10 yards. I was just cracking up! Just glad we lost early so I could just accept it early … the team was off for sure… no energy and nobody wanted to play besides Rico, Ferg & Gallup. Defense was lame **. It’s like they knew Dan is gone
at least some of these threads people are pointing the blame where it mostly should go I realize we lost as a team but that defense worst showing of championship playoff defense I've ever seen I mean this looked like Mike Nolan I mean this rod marinelli all over again they were expecting our offense to have to do what they did in Seattle this has been like this most of the games against the better offenses teams that can actually put pressure on a defense Dan Quinn's defense is folded like a cheap door they cannot stop anyone unless they got the ball turned over...
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
100,916
Reaction score
109,348
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I MESSED UP!!!!!!!!!

insider-cowboys-dc-dan-quinn-waiting-coach-nfc.jpg
 

nalam

The realist
Messages
11,722
Reaction score
7,035
Why did they play so much Zone? Cowboys are a man team. Love feasted vs zone coverage this year and was mortal vs man.

I never heard an explanation. Makes no sense.
Exactly I had the same question, Love was weak against man and good against zone was what we hear all week .
 

Bigdog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,853
Reaction score
11,502
It was as if Quinn was sabotaging us on his way out. But why would he do that? Clearly he wanted to coach the D to victory, so what he did makes even less sense than sabotage. I'm grasping at straws. I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!
After that performance who is going to hire him. I would think twice if I was an owner or GM
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,066
Reaction score
16,497
Even if you are worried about the speed of their WRs they had their safeties deep most of the game. You can play man underneath with your safeties over the top

I saw that Love's qbr was much lower against man coverage as well.
 

SwagSurfer

Well-Known Member
Messages
868
Reaction score
1,032
Seems like DQ had other stuff going on and didn't spend any time gameplanning. That defense was all time bad.
 
Top