The30YardSlant;3958688 said:
Jordan was only the most valuable player to his team for one of his six MVP years. Without him, the Bulls starring Pippen still won 57 games and made the ECF. That didnt stop the voters from voting for him over and over. The award goes to the best player on one of the three best teams, regardless of merit.
and that kind of proves my point, the team was still good without him, but it was atop the standings at the end of the year and they had a great player, so he got the MVP. If the mavs had won 61 games instead of the spurs, Dirk would have been up these with rose for the MVP.
its something that comes up very often in MVP discussions but you can see its been consistent, duncan had one of the best records in the league in 02 and 03, garnett in 04, nash in 05 and 06, dirk in 07, kobe in 08, lebron in 09 and 10 and rose this year.
i think the real question is how they award the MVP, its a fair argument to make to say it should go to situations like Howards. But the way it has always been presented, Rose was the MVP and deservedly so