trickblue;1941472 said:Hasn't Haynesworth always been known as somewhat of an underachiever?
Remember this was a contract year for him...
trickblue;1941472 said:Remember this was a contract year for him...
I'll take quality depth over a big name starter any day.Rack;1941141 said:We have THREE players that can play NT and play it WELL.
What the hell are you smoking?
Of course I'd rather see Ratliff at LE (STARTING) and Fergie manning the middle with Tank backing him up, but we don't "need" a NT.
Hostile;1941501 said:He's a name, not a difference maker.
Pass.
EPL0c0;1941519 said:I'll take quality depth over a big name starter any day.
I hate to use the Giants as an example but look at their interior linemen: Cofield (Joseph), Robbins (Alford). Any combination of those four guys comes in and they don't have a significant dropoff in production.
ABQCOWBOY;1941768 said:Well, nobody is going to want to hear this but if you want a NT that can bring pressure right up the gut, Shaun Rodgers is probably the guy that is available and can do this best. I mean, yeah, he only plays in a limited capacity. Yeah, he has issues with motivation but the production is still there. Last year, he had 7 Sacks playing only part time, so to speak.
ABQCOWBOY;1941768 said:Well, nobody is going to want to hear this but if you want a NT that can bring pressure right up the gut, Shaun Rodgers is probably the guy that is available and can do this best. I mean, yeah, he only plays in a limited capacity. Yeah, he has issues with motivation but the production is still there. Last year, he had 7 Sacks playing only part time, so to speak.
Romo2Owens4six;1941780 said:i think so too, but haynesworth is good also. people forgave TO for the star issue can we not forgive him for a stupid reaction
Rack;1941141 said:We have THREE players that can play NT and play it WELL.
What the hell are you smoking?
Of course I'd rather see Ratliff at LE (STARTING) and Fergie manning the middle with Tank backing him up, but we don't "need" a NT.