- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
After seeing Tanney's play today, combined with the news of the Waters deal being dead... does anyone feel any differently about this idea?
No.
After seeing Tanney's play today, combined with the news of the Waters deal being dead... does anyone feel any differently about this idea?
right now you would not get a used condom for Orton
harsh but unfortunately not far off the mark
You guys do realize that Orton is considered the top backup in the league and would start for a handful of teams? He has value.
You guys do realize that Orton is considered the top backup in the league and would start for a handful of teams? He has value.
You guys do realize that Orton is considered the top backup in the league and would start for a handful of teams? He has value.
Let me preface this post by saying...
1. I know that non-draft trades happen in the NFL about as often as Hostile hanging a Dan Bailey or Rafael Septien poster on his bedroom wall.
2. I know this is never going to happen.
But I'm just curious as to why I haven't even heard the idea floated. Orton is arguably the best backup QB in the NFL. There are a ton of teams that need desperate help at QB. We are weak at the OG spot. It makes sense to at least entertain the idea. Look, I love having great insurance in case Romo goes down. But does anyone actually believe that if Romo went down, Orton would be good enough to win a Super Bowl for us? I don't. I'd rather take my chances with Romo and have a quality RG than to have the great insurance and a big question mark protecting him.
Then again, I'd take my chances and roll without car insurance if given the choice, so maybe I'm just a thrill seeker.
You guys do realize that Orton is considered the top backup in the league and would start for a handful of teams? He has value.