Waffle
Not Just For Breakfast Anymore
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 1
1. They cut a hard working, yet unpopular young QB who was headed into 4th season as starter and happened to play on a team that went 5-1 in their first six games, yet his play declined the rest of the season as he "led the team" to a 5-6 finish down the stretch when it really mattered. Player had upside only because of age even though his stats are virtually IDENTICAL to Vinny's. Yes, Vinny is obviously on the downside of career.
2. Players weren't concerned that Carter was dumped like that, VT was GIVEN the job because Romo and Henson weren't ready. Sugar may have mentioned the team was not onboard with this move, but do we really know that to be an absolute truth? (No offense BSugar )
3. While it forced Dallas to play the entire season with a 41 year old QB, Vinny was brought in to COMPETE with Quincy, not back him up. In addition, nobody forced or mandated Quincy to violate the league's substance abuse policy mulitple times.
4. Just because someone speculated that the team offered Carter a contract after he was cut doesn't make it true.
5. JJ cut a player who was one bad night away from a 4 game suspension. While Carter seems to be a model player in New York, getting cut could have been a necessary wake up call for him. While a 98 Qb rating at NY may look good on the surface, his poor clock management skills at the end of the Baltimore contest cost them the game.
(READ THIS NORS) The next week, he was only able to put up 116 yards and lead the team to a measly 10 points at lowly Cleveland, who gave up over 250 yards passing and 4 TDs to psuedo-rookie Carson Palmer and the Bengals just the week before. Quincy barely completed 50% of his passes against Cleveland (going 11/20), and he only threw for a pathetic 133 yards in his start against the Cardinals. In Quincy's two starts, the Jets only scored a TOTAL of 23 points, but won on the back of a good defense. (That sounds familiar)
6) Was this cut was a JJ slap at Parcells? Don't think so since Parcells makes all the moves. Now, if you write for profootball talk.com, you could make up a unsubstantiated story implying that Parcells embarrassed Jerry by going with Carter over Hutch in 2003 and so Jerry cut Carter.
7) What was the risk in keeping Carter? Well, most teams don't keep 4 QBs on the roster. He fails a “test” you are back to only TWO QBs.
Look...the guy came to the Cowboys as a 2nd Round reach with Jerry Jones slobbering all over him. And the guy couldn't even throw a spiral. Wade Wilson basically had to re-teach him how to throw from scratch. He still threw his share of "ducks" even after working on his technique. He started as a rookie until injured, and then he played his way to the bench in 2002. He played ALL of 2003 and didn't improve as we collapsed to a 5-6 record to end the season. His stats are virtually exact to Vinny's.
Ask yourself this question. Was Quincy Carter a QB who's play even resembled Troy Aikman's or made you think he could be as good? How about Danny White?
It's laughable how some people have lowered their standards and expectations so much at QB since Aikman left.
2. Players weren't concerned that Carter was dumped like that, VT was GIVEN the job because Romo and Henson weren't ready. Sugar may have mentioned the team was not onboard with this move, but do we really know that to be an absolute truth? (No offense BSugar )
3. While it forced Dallas to play the entire season with a 41 year old QB, Vinny was brought in to COMPETE with Quincy, not back him up. In addition, nobody forced or mandated Quincy to violate the league's substance abuse policy mulitple times.
4. Just because someone speculated that the team offered Carter a contract after he was cut doesn't make it true.
5. JJ cut a player who was one bad night away from a 4 game suspension. While Carter seems to be a model player in New York, getting cut could have been a necessary wake up call for him. While a 98 Qb rating at NY may look good on the surface, his poor clock management skills at the end of the Baltimore contest cost them the game.
(READ THIS NORS) The next week, he was only able to put up 116 yards and lead the team to a measly 10 points at lowly Cleveland, who gave up over 250 yards passing and 4 TDs to psuedo-rookie Carson Palmer and the Bengals just the week before. Quincy barely completed 50% of his passes against Cleveland (going 11/20), and he only threw for a pathetic 133 yards in his start against the Cardinals. In Quincy's two starts, the Jets only scored a TOTAL of 23 points, but won on the back of a good defense. (That sounds familiar)
6) Was this cut was a JJ slap at Parcells? Don't think so since Parcells makes all the moves. Now, if you write for profootball talk.com, you could make up a unsubstantiated story implying that Parcells embarrassed Jerry by going with Carter over Hutch in 2003 and so Jerry cut Carter.
7) What was the risk in keeping Carter? Well, most teams don't keep 4 QBs on the roster. He fails a “test” you are back to only TWO QBs.
Look...the guy came to the Cowboys as a 2nd Round reach with Jerry Jones slobbering all over him. And the guy couldn't even throw a spiral. Wade Wilson basically had to re-teach him how to throw from scratch. He still threw his share of "ducks" even after working on his technique. He started as a rookie until injured, and then he played his way to the bench in 2002. He played ALL of 2003 and didn't improve as we collapsed to a 5-6 record to end the season. His stats are virtually exact to Vinny's.
Ask yourself this question. Was Quincy Carter a QB who's play even resembled Troy Aikman's or made you think he could be as good? How about Danny White?
It's laughable how some people have lowered their standards and expectations so much at QB since Aikman left.