Big Dakota
New Member
- Messages
- 11,876
- Reaction score
- 0
big dog cowboy;1317672 said:Wanna upgrade our pass coverage? Fix the pass rush.
Coming to you since 1996.
big dog cowboy;1317672 said:Wanna upgrade our pass coverage? Fix the pass rush.
bigbadroy;1317694 said:i heard simion rice will be a fa, anybody care for simion rice?
screw the 3-4! hey bill, this isn't the 80s anymore! the 3-4 is run different nowadayssmarta5150;1317696 said:And not really a 3-4 DE.
TheSport78;1317703 said:assuming ellis comes back..i kinda like the duo of carpenter and ellis with carp playing on 1st, 2nd down and ILB in the nickel (replacing bradie), while ellis can play either OLB or DE in the nickel..lots of flexibility there
smarta5150;1317707 said:I hope Ellis can somehow come back and help us where we lack the pass rush.
what he said.AdamJT13;1317573 said:In 2005, he was not good. In the combined KC Joyner/Football Outsiders shutdown cornerback rankings, out of the 58 cornerbacks who started at least 10 games, he ranked anywhere from 42nd to 51st, depending on the statistic (things such as yards per pass, target percentage, yards per target, success percentage, etc.). I'm still working on combining STATS' numbers into those, but STATS had him eighth (eighth-worst) in times targeted, catches allowed, yards allowed and touchdowns allowed.
In 2006, he was slightly better, but STATS still had him 16th (16th-worst) in times targeted, 11th in catches allowed and 29th in yards allowed.
Here's how STATS had Clements and Anthony Henry for 2006 --
Clements -- 59-for-99 (59.6 percent), 658 yards, one TD, 20 PD, three INT
Henry -- 60-for-110 (54.5 percent), 688 yards, five TD, 21 PD, two INT
If Clements doesn't revert back to the way he played in 2004, he really wouldn't be an upgrade over Henry. And if he played like he did in 2005, he'd be worse -- and he'd make a lot more money.
Hood from the Beagles.smarta5150;1317444 said:Samuels from NE I believe.
TheSport78;1317380 said:Bills | Team expected to lose Clements in offseason
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:02:18 -0800
Mark Gaughan, of the Buffalo News, reports the Buffalo Bills will unlikely be able to re-sign CB Nate Clements, who is expected to receive a lucrative offer as a free agent in the offseason.
this could be the missing piece to our secondary..especially if henry is moved to FS
Newman, Clements, Henry and Roy playing close to the line...now that is NASTY!
Are there any potential free agents that did well? Also, how well did T-New do?AdamJT13;1317632 said:Asante Samuel wasn't much better, according to STATS. He allowed 54 catches on 102 attempts for 646 yards (52.9 percent) and two touchdowns, with 24 passes defelected. He missed one game, so those numbers would project to 58-for-109 for 689 yards over 16 games -- almost identical to those for Henry and Clements.
The difference, of course, was that Samuel had 10 interceptions this season. But he never had more than three picks in any year before this season, and his shutdown numbers weren't any better than Clements' numbers last season (STATS had Samuel allowing fewer completions but more yards and touchdowns, Joyner had Samuel allowing the 10th-most yards, and FO had him allowing the 12th-most).
Chocolate Lab;1317446 said:Maybe in Washington, though...
Wrangler87;1317401 said:Cannot always judge a CB's performance by their interceptions. Sometimes, offenses stay clear of the good CB's and don't throw their way.
AmishCowboy;1317817 said:How About Rodrick Hood from the Eagles?, He's ready to start, has played a lot and would be a lot cheaper then Samuel or Clement.
theogt;1319115 said:Yes, we have the cap space. Is he a good signing, though? Well, Asante Samuel is probably the better CB.
I never even heard that Vasher could be available. If that's the case, I'd go after him over Samuel and Clements. Vasher is a very good tackler and is a proven cover corner. Plus, he's also a very good KR. He'd cost us less than the other two.....LatinMind;1319118 said:give me either and ill be happy. both are 26 and both are very good at what they do. clements is the more physical type, while samuels is a posistion guy.
u cant go wrong with either. but me my first choice would be on of them chicago bears cb's. either tillman or vasher. the bears have said they probalby wont be able to sign both after that big contract they signed ricky manning to, and with the emergence of 23. lol his name slips my mind