Women march topless in Portland without incident

Not the types you'd necessarily want to see naked.

LOL at the dudes with cameras, though.

crop.topless.0404.jpg
 
http://img512.*************/img512/8526/croptopless0404.jpg
 
bbgun;3334600 said:
http://img512.*************/img512/8526/croptopless0404.jpg
Don't you mean flat-chested chick or a dude with Bob's physique?
 
SultanOfSix;3334822 said:
I swear some people just have nothing better to do.

You object?

I fully support topless marching.

Only downside I can see so far is there aren't many women in that photo I want to see topless. It's actually kind of hard to separate the men from the women.
 
If they don't want men to look then don't take your top off.

I mean come on do you think guys don't look in Europe at the beaches hell yea they due.
 
Hoofbite;3334844 said:
You object?

I fully support topless marching.

Only downside I can see so far is there aren't many women in that photo I want to see topless. It's actually kind of hard to separate the men from the women.

I would enjoy looking at the female body as much as any other (heterosexual) guy as it is his natural inclination, but I fail to see how this benefits women in any manner whatsoever. Men find it difficult not to look at a woman's cleavage, let alone the entire package exposed.
 
SultanOfSix;3335350 said:
I would enjoy looking at the female body as much as any other (heterosexual) guy as it is his natural inclination, but I fail to see how this benefits women in any manner whatsoever. Men find it difficult not to look at a woman's cleavage, let alone the entire package exposed.

This is absolutely true IMO. No matter how glorious or horrid, a man will look and be unable to prevent himself. It's just how it works. I mean, some things are just as basic as that. I don't get it.
 
Viper;3336090 said:
I'm an *** man, when is that march?:D

When it is socially appropriate for men to be unclothed down there. The point of this march is because men can do it. Besides, technically, it should be a men march for showing *** since it's pretty acceptable for a woman (especially on the beach/mini-skirts/boy shorts)
 
VietCowboy;3336347 said:
When it is socially appropriate for men to be unclothed down there. The point of this march is because men can do it. Besides, technically, it should be a men march for showing *** since it's pretty acceptable for a woman (especially on the beach/mini-skirts/boy shorts)

Bob's getting aroused.
 
We need one of them marches here in TX:busty: :stetson:
 
CowboyFan74;3336403 said:
We need one of them marches here in TX:busty: :stetson:

Good news for you: Boobs haven't been made illegal in Texas. Only your butthole and fun place are illegal. That doesn't mean bared mammary glands is a right yet, so you may get topless marches in cities where they've outlawed it to get said law tested in court.
 
Lol.

I honestly believe a woman should have the right to go topless anywhere a man can. So good for them?

But for a woman to want to be topless AND want men not to stare? Out of their ****ing minds. Will never happen and it's not something that can simply be "changed".

If men walked around with their ***** out, women would look. Even if it wasn't due to some attraction or "OMG *****" mindset. It's something thats just out there it's going to get looked at.

This **** is just human nature.
 
Men are visual by nature.

Women aren't neccessarily.

If a march was set up where men walked around with $100 bill stapled to their chest, there'd be hordes of female oglers as well.
 
Teren_Kanan;3336664 said:
Lol.

I honestly believe a woman should have the right to go topless anywhere a man can. So good for them?

But for a woman to want to be topless AND want men not to stare? Out of their ****ing minds. Will never happen and it's not something that can simply be "changed".

If men walked around with their ***** out, women would look. Even if it wasn't due to some attraction or "OMG *****" mindset. It's something thats just out there it's going to get looked at.

This **** is just human nature.

True. If jugs don't attract/distract men, then why are women constantly getting them augmented?
 
bbgun;3336854 said:
True. If jugs don't attract/distract men, then why are women constantly getting them augmented?

Because they look better? I don't know what you think, but when I was watching Nell the other night (great movie btw), and saw Jodie Foster, it would have looked a lot better with a little extra.

With that said, personally, I find the total opposite to also not be too attractive looking. I remember reading a stat somewhere that there are an equal if not more women who do reductions as opposed to augmenting them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,194
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top