Working on a "Couple Substantive Trades"? One Down

DRella

Well-Known Member
Messages
418
Reaction score
404
So Pickens deal is done, I would call this as "SUBSTANSIVE" !!!! Jerry wasn't lying. But his exact words were "a couple of substantive" deals!!!!

So I ask you Cowboys nation, who would you like to see them trade for to fill a void?

Ramsey??
Hall???
Defensive Tackle???
Another player???

I vote for another defensive tackle I just don't know who is available.
 
So Pickens deal is done, I would call this as "SUBSTANSIVE" !!!! Jerry wasn't lying. But his exact words were "a couple of substantive" deals!!!!

So I ask you Cowboys nation, who would you like to see them trade for to fill a void?

Ramsey??
Hall???
Defensive Tackle???
Another player???

I vote for another defensive tackle I just don't know who is available.
Pretty sure the other was RB Breece Hall. Not sure about that now since they drafted two RB's.
 
Weakest position is either DT or maybe CB. But overall I'm betting the trade Jerry was talking about was Hall. Since the Cowboys drafted 2 RB's, that's not gonna happen. And I don't expect any more trades. Especially one that could be called substantive.
 
Ideally, a 1Tech!!!
If Breece Hall is available pull the trigger. Look at the offense with a legitimate RB, it would be very hard to stop, potentially, the current RBs won't garner respect from defenses like a Hall.

Open to trading for Ramsey , as long as, his character checks out. Ramsey can play CB and eventually move over to FS in a year or two.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,377
Messages
13,870,663
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top