Yep . Our HC total as a franchise is skewed with Landry’s 29 years.im sorry but calling all of them worst is wrong..putting all the coaches in order from good to bad would be beter and to all the garett hayters hes like what 2nd all time on the win list, I klnow hes no parcells or Jimmy landry etc etc
by far Campo was the wrost with Gaily a close second but Switzer just what he didn in college and hada a SB ring regardless of the sitaion he took over takes him off the list as well..
Truth be told in the All-time DC history we have less coahes then many teams and only have truly two that were BAD, is a positive not negative..
my list in order of best to last
Landry
Jimmy
parcells
Garett
Switzer
Phillips
Gaily
Campo
that all the coaches we've had since 1960 is crazy
Yea I can see how some would feel that way if they had higher expectations with the teams and talent we had.Garrett by far was the worst. He had better rosters and the better part of a decade to do something.
The real question is McC catching Booger at the right moment in his life? Has he learned? Did the pain of letting his chosen one walk teach him anything?Good question. Probably cause of Jerry’s meddling and distractions from dysfunctional situation.
Id look for McCarthy to improve on 8-8 but ultimately he’ll need to improve on the results in 2016 and 2018 and overcome Jerry. Something the rest of these coaches aren’t able to accomplish.
IMO, Campo isn't equipped to be a HC, but he did OK w/ what he had. I sorta want to give him a pass due to screwed up circumstances.Campo had no talent whatsoever and cant be properly judged because of it. Garrett had the most talent and the most time and was the biggest failure out of all of them. Garrett 100% is the worst coach and its not even close. I would take Campo or any of them over the horrid Garrett.
If we're going to use records, there is absolutely no point in even having this conversation.I was never a big supporter of Garrett’s game day coaching ability which was obviously not a strength of his. But if we’re going to use records and the influence assembling talent he has to be placed closer to the top than bottom. We won’t know until McCarthy results have come in if we should have done more with what he had. That’s still subjective.
Why do you consider Switzer above Campo and Phillips?Campo wasn't good but he was given a poor roster, terrible drafts and bad asset management by Jerry Jones(Galloway trade) which stripped the team of two first rounders.
I thought Gailey got the short stick big time here.
Garrett was given a decade to build the team with a decent core to start with and managed two wins in the post season.
Phillips was a breath of fresh air for the team post Parcells but he was too lax + Garrett over his shoulders and Jerry was overruling Phillips on fines etc.
Bad coaches in no order: Campo Phillips
Average coaches in no order: Switzer, Garrett, Gailey
Decent: Parcells
Records isn’t all I was using. I’ve stated that. Just like game day coaching isn’t all I was using.If we're going to use records, there is absolutely no point in even having this conversation.
Agree. The team's record during their tenure is a factor, just down on the list. Campo would be the huge exception.Records isn’t all I was using. I’ve stated that. Just like game day coaching isn’t all I was using.
Who this era has helped influence Jerry with better drafts, personnel decisions and team building is a big part of it with me.
In the end without enough talent it’s not going to matter who’s coaching.
Why do you consider Switzer above Campo and Phillips?
Sorry if that was misleading. The intent of my thought was discussing the seasons and coaching SINCE our last championship.Read the OP wrong. Thought it included Switzer in 95. Ie post Jimmy tenure, not 96 on.
If 96 on then bad
Sorry if that was misleading. The intent of my thought was discussing the seasons and coaching SINCE our last championship.