Would Dak Had Continued Playing Like Herbert Did?

Mactin

Well-Known Member
Messages
500
Reaction score
289
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,138
Reaction score
48,805
I mean we all saw him try to bang his ankle back in place on national TV. If this is a dig. I'm say it's a dumb question.

Yes, and it usually takes something quite serious for him to take himself out of a game. Naturally, a broken thumb would be serious (and it seems he did try to play on it) as you can't exactly grip a ball if your thumb is broken.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,022
Reaction score
20,109
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?
whhhaaat!? I hav eno idea what you are trying to say here? what conclusion are you driving to?
 

Jipper

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,994
Reaction score
23,508
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?

this is beyond dumb, clearly you don’t understand the difference between injured and hurt
 

bigdnlaca

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,836
Reaction score
1,403
Didn’t see game. Herbert stayed in game because he haven’t got paid yet. The last thing you want is to show that you can’t be relied on when things get tough before getting the bag.

That is not just Herbert. It’s human nature. You want to prove to your team or co workers that one of your best assets in your profession is availability.
 
Last edited:

Twin928

Well-Known Member
Messages
592
Reaction score
386
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?
He broke his thumb on his throwing hand he said he couldn’t grip the ball I don’t like the contract but dak the competitor and leader wouldn’t of came out if he could play next post
 

CTcowboy203

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,805
Reaction score
4,879
So attacking his play isn’t good enough (and there’s a lot to attack) now we have to attack his mental and actual toughness? a guy whose mom passed from cancer, brother from suicide and is still smiling and positive and you have doubts if he’s tough after trying to fix his foot on the field with a torn acl?

attack his accuracy, attack his talent. There’s a lot there. Don’t question his toughness
 

BotchedLobotomy

Wide Right
Messages
15,686
Reaction score
24,127
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?
Questioning Daks toughness is the lamest thing I’ve heard.
:facepalm:
 

Pompey-Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
3,771
Not going to repeat what others have posted, although I agree with most of it. My question would be SHOULD Herbert have continued playing, I would suggest it would have been better for his team during the game and for his longterm health if he hadn't.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?

Justin Herbert is everyones darling. Kudos to him for sticking it out, but prior to that last drive he basically lost the game for them. That pick 6 was horrendous. The guy gets a free pass no matter how many mistakes he makes.

His 4th quarter meltdowns are commonplace in his young career. Heck even the announcers were giving him a pass saying how the pick was a "miscommunication". Its was point blank a horrible pass.

Hebert has absolutely EVERYTHING he could ever want now. Great Oline, pass catchers, big play back, great defense, coaching. If he doenst make the playoffs this year, its pathetic.

Personally I think they have one of the best teams in the NFL.

Mahomes did much more with less last night. Those two TD passes were all Mahomes. Although that KC defense is much better now.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
You Dak haters have seriously dumbed down this forum. Unbelievable. No shame. No respect whatsoever.

Its like Xmas for them. Dak had a bad game and hes hurt. They can crawl out and get some sun for another 5 or 6 games until the darkness falls on them again.

But who knows............by then the other half of the Oline might be hurt.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,717
Reaction score
30,414
Geez. Don’t you dare even question it. Did you see him try to bang his ankle back in place so he could get up and get to the huddle. We know that he will go if he can go. And at one point he had the most 4th quarter comebacks or come from behind wins. The longer he plays the more stats compile and the more the great or good things that he has done gets watered down. It’s a what have you done for me lately league. Always will be.

We have a front office that can’t keep talent in place. We have a OC that is not creative at all. It’s the same playbook and calls every year. He abandons the run when down by 3..
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,946
Reaction score
4,044
I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?

Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?

You guys never fail to amaze me. Yes Herbert is an amazing young quarterback. Bit name one quarterback in NFL history that could continue playing with damages in his THROWING HAND?????

You don't have to grip the football with your ribs..... smmfh.
 
Top