I know Romo would have and did in a way but I'm curious. After seeing how Justin Herbert got back in the game against the Chiefs and kept on playing QB despite being injured in what I think were his ribs, I wonder if Dak would have gone out there and tried his best to win the game like how Herbert almost did. Would he have stayed on the sidelines to not risk any more serious injuries to his ribs or would he have tried to do what Romo did in 2011 against SF and what Herbert did? Would he have fared better than Herbert did?
Really makes you wonder how different those two are as QB and if Herbert might be the better QB due to what we all saw against the Chiefs. Your thoughts guys?
umm YES he would , played with swollen hand amongst other things, can you ridiculous dak haters STOP Posting, its not working hes our qb this year next year and maybe the year after
stop the hate trolling already, he tried to stay in with broken THROWING thumb. Many players played with broken or bruised ribs, Herberts not special..
dak is tough and his injury was BROKEN HAND cant hold the ball cant stay in with a Broken ankle, cant walk cant play
moronic statements continue. yes the posts are hollow and not popular i know you think its popular to bash our Players , its not..
BTW don't bother responding, i block all clueless fans with zero football knowledge and only post emotionally charged hate troll type post against our team.