Would the Cowboys be 4-1 with Dak?

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,887
Reaction score
27,362
So rather than discuss the points, you revert to trashing. I see both sides of the argument and Dak isnt above criticism (despite being the more talented QB).

The problem arises when certain fan's see no issue in Dak's play....always someone else's fault.
Can you read? I said Dak played poorly. I also know there are 50 other guys. Blaming Dak for everything is juvenile. Lots here do that. You going to be ok?
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
5,105
Can you read? I said Dak played poorly. I also know there are 50 other guys. Blaming Dak for everything is juvenile. Lots here do that. You going to be ok?

Hand on a second, you didnt apportion any blame on Dak in the post that we were discussing (below).

All I was pointing out to you is that Dak had the running plays, and the talking heads (well Helman) kind of indicated that Dak may have contributed to the changing strategy.

Well if you would have watched the game you would have seen Moore’s game plan was pure trash and the Bucs defense was ready. Cowboys abandoned the run early. OL was terrible. Lamb sucked. Try watching the games and you will see it.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,250
Reaction score
20,540
Depends.
Everything is chaos theory.
Does Kellen tone down the pass game and go with what they had been preaching all off-season with the run?
Does Dak get the message and hand off instead of calling out of it because he sees a LB in a spot he doesn't like?
Does McCarthy flex his prodigious belly upon the O to do what he had been saying he wants to do?

He could have done what Coop has done.
He could have flamed out and we're all at a point of pure exasperation.

All I can say is we'll see what happens when they give him his spot back.
And he will get his spot back.
For better, or worse.
Very true. Nice post, as usual.
 

Jason 82 Witten

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,211
Reaction score
2,045
There’s absolutely no way to know. Dac haters will say no, Dac lovers will say yes
 
Last edited:

zeke21

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,595
Reaction score
2,664
No way we are 4-1 with Dak. We would all be here lamenting how the D is great but gassed by the 2nd half because the offence is going 3 and out.. the Oline can't protect Dak and he is sacked all the time for loss.. the running game looks ok but only gets 10 carriers a game.. KM is a dud and MM should be fired.

Dak has consistently shown he can not beat good teams. His record on the matter is very very clear. No way he beats an 'in form' Giants and last years SB teams. No way.

Would note that I do NOT think Rush is the answer.. but he is better than Dak because it means that we are forced to use our strength.. which is our running game and limiting the number of snaps our D has to face.
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,849
Reaction score
15,492
No way we are 4-1 with Dak. We would all be here lamenting how the D is great but gassed by the 2nd half because the offence is going 3 and out.. the Oline can't protect Dak and he is sacked all the time for loss.. the running game looks ok but only gets 10 carriers a game.. KM is a dud and MM should be fired.

Dak has consistently shown he can not beat good teams. His record on the matter is very very clear. No way he beats an 'in form' Giants and last years SB teams. No way.

Would note that I do NOT think Rush is the answer.. but he is better than Dak because it means that we are forced to use our strength.. which is our running game and limiting the number of snaps our D has to face.

Well, Cooper Rush didn't limit the snaps the defense had to face tonight.
 

droopdog7

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,787
Reaction score
5,532
What's really dumb about this thread is that dak was 6-1 just last year. So sure, he could also have been 4-1.
 
Top