would the flex work today?

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Aikbach;1269060 said:
13-2 are they not?

So are the Bears. woo-hoo. Indy was 10-0 at one point. That doesn't mean the warts weren't ALWAYS there. It just means noone took advantage of them yet. Playing one of the league's weakest schedules will do that for you.
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
superpunk;1269065 said:
So are the Bears. woo-hoo. Indy was 10-0 at one point. That doesn't mean the warts weren't ALWAYS there. It just means noone took advantage of them yet. Playing one of the league's weakest schedules will do that for you.
We shall see, it will probably be a Bear v. Charger Super Bowl which makes for ugly color contrast but this has been an ugly year for football so it would be fitting.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Aikbach;1269077 said:
We shall see, it will probably be a Bear v. Charger Super Bowl which makes for ugly color contrast but this has been an ugly year for football so it would be fitting.
I really doubt either of those teams makes the dance. Just remember that. ;) Feel free to toss it back at me if they make it.
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
superpunk;1269079 said:
I really doubt either of those teams makes the dance. Just remember that. ;) Feel free to toss it back at me if they make it.
You think I want to be right? Not at all, I want to eat Cowboy pie but my hopes have been all but gutted.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
iceberg;1268756 said:
the rules changed once. if for whatever reason the $ of the sport is threatened by people "not as into it" they would change again.

the trouble is - how many of the younger fans who've only known it this way and were brought up in a "quick fix" society would be as inclined to want it the way it used to be?
Here's my deal. I'm 23 and followed football at a relatively early age. From the age of 5 or so,I watched the games every week. (weird child, I know) This was in 1988/89 so the Cowboys sucked back then. The 49ers, Commanders, Giants and Bears ruled the NFL in those days and had players that had played for their respective teams for years and were dominant in comparison to the rest of the league. As I grew a little older, the Cowboys rose again to elite status. Just in time of course for free agency to begin in 1993, followed by the implementation of the slary cap in 1994. This eroded the Cowboys chances of having an extended dynasty like the Packers Steelers and 49ers.
One of the things that are so attractive in sports like MLB and the NBA is that it is so hard to knock off the kingpins of the league, that when you do it feels like a really worthy accomplishment

I miss that in the NFL.

Starting with the Broncos, The league was treated to five first time Super Bowl winners in a six year span. Prior to 1997, the last time there was a first time Super Bowl winner was in 1986. The eighties saw four first time winners (the previous four kingpins of the eighties mentioned previously) Those four teams where championship contenders for years following their initial Super Bowl wins. We can't really say thyat for the first time winners in the 90's save the Patriots.

I suppose if you're a fan of a team in a middle-level market and previously did not have the financial means to compete year in and year out under the old system, then the free agency/salary cap era of the NFL is great due to its leveling of the competive field, if you will. My friend who's a Buccaneer fan would agree.

Me, I lomg for the days of when groups like the Steel Curtain, the Doomsday Defense, the Purple People Eaters were given enough time to gel into a cohesive unit and thus permanently ensure their place of football lore.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Under the old system there was no real FA or salary cap- any team could build a great one as long as you had the organization to do it. Arizona, and the rest of the perennial losers did not. TB had been good for a while then faded again. NO the worst example of all.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
burmafrd;1269123 said:
Under the old system there was no real FA or salary cap- any team could build a great one as long as you had the organization to do it. Arizona, and the rest of the perennial losers did not. TB had been good for a while then faded again. NO the worst example of all.
That's the really vexing part of the salary cap era. The palying field has been leveled so dramatically that even a mediocre organization can luck themselves into a Super Bowl run if everything goes right.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
iceberg;1268650 said:
with all this talk of defenses and the basic 3-4, 4-3, i was wondering if these were our only real options. i've brought up the flex before to get some commentary on it to simply find out more about it, but i'm curious, would it work today?


No...from what I understand, it takes a good 3 or 4 year to even learn the flex defense, and free agency just will not allow for the time to try...
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
windward;1269129 said:
That's the really vexing part of the salary cap era. The palying field has been leveled so dramatically that even a mediocre organization can luck themselves into a Super Bowl run if everything goes right.
Just say Pittsburgh, don't generalize it, just come out and say Pittsburgh.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Just having NO as a contender proves that. Though Arizona is still proof that true instituitional stupidity will triumph in the end.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
Aikbach;1269131 said:
Just say Pittsburgh, don't generalize it, just come out and say Pittsburgh.
I was actually thinking of Tampa Bay and New England 2001. But Pittsburgh fits the bill as well.
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
windward;1269148 said:
I was actually thinking of Tampa Bay and New England 2001. But Pittsburgh fits the bill as well.
2001 should've been the Raiders. They get ripped off in the playoffs by Imaculate Receptions and Tuck Rules.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,683
Reaction score
4,539
Aikbach;1269151 said:
2001 should've been the Raiders. They get ripped off in the playoffs by Imaculate Receptions and Tuck Rules.
yeah and it was truly serendipitous that the Buccaneers faced the lame duck Mariucci-led Niners, McChoke and a team the head coach knew everyhting about.
 

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
iceberg;1268726 said:
this is probably one of the reasons i'm not as "huge" a football fan as i used to be. it used to be about teamwork and getting it together. these days it just seems much more about instant "slightly better than average" and the concept of a team or players staying on teams is simply gone.

i prefer bad arse dynasties (even when not ours) over what we have today.

I have the same feelings as you do about todays NFL. I'll take the dynasties as well. I'm tired of a league of mediocrity.

With the fluxuation of a roster the "Flex" would never work it's just too complicated.. If by some miracle if a team could keep the same group of players together ...maybe.
 

chinch

No Quarter
Messages
3,596
Reaction score
0
iceberg;1268650 said:
with all this talk of defenses and the basic 3-4, 4-3, i was wondering if these were our only real options. i've brought up the flex before to get some commentary on it to simply find out more about it, but i'm curious, would it work today?
no chance

too much player movement and free agency.

too many highlight shows.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,688
Reaction score
18,038
Be curious no more. No, it won't work.
Parcells is stuck on his ways.
It's his way or the highway.
If he's from New York or Jersey he's a great one.
If he once coached him, he's in.
If he's used a system he'll use it for life.
He wont change.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
GimmeTheBall!;1269210 said:
Be curious no more. No, it won't work.
Parcells is stuck on his ways.
It's his way or the highway.
If he's from New York or Jersey he's a great one.
If he once coached him, he's in.
If he's used a system he'll use it for life.
He wont change.


So, are you saying that old dogs cannot learn new tricks?

:confused:
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
5Stars;1269216 said:
So, are you saying that old dogs cannot learn new tricks?

:confused:
He's saying old dogs should be put to sleep, Gimme is a big supporter of euthanasia.;)
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Aikbach;1269217 said:
He's saying old dogs should be put to sleep, Gimme is a big supporter of euthanasia.;)


:laugh2: Ok....
 

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Aikbach;1269217 said:
He's saying old dogs should be put to sleep, Gimme is a big supporter of euthanasia.;)

So he issssssssss..........I'll show him a Mercy Killing.
 
Top