They can do something.....like buying out a year or two on a rookie deal to get these guys to sign for more comfortable numbers.....or let some of them walk.
The return clearly isn't there and we shouldn't have to offer our own players deals on par with those that are needed to entice someone to move their family etc....
How many times have we made a player the current highest paid when they haven't really earned it?
Plenty.....and we haven't won, yet have cap problems.
If we're talking about "core" players, .there shouldn't and not likely to be that many
those are your .Zack Martins, and Dak Prescott, ..
Now when those core players don't pan out, that's the nature of the game, and every NFL team just has to deal with the decline or disappointing expectations.
Even the Pats have known to release or move on from FA .. from key guys. ala CB Stephen Gilmore. ..
Key serious injuries, wear and tear toll, or just not meeting expectations of that re-signed huge contract.
- i cannot speak for the Clevelands, Jax's, Ravens, Cardinals direction and how they plan out their respective cap structure.. and i'm not always on board with how
Stephen ducks the idea of FA fishing for at least one sole impact vet guy that can help take us over the hump - which you do see the more playoff-SB competitor teams do
(Pat's with Matt Judon, Chiefs with Joe Thuney,..Cincy with Trey Hendrickson, etc.)
- But there are times when i am glad with Stephen's philosophy of not dishing out big contract money to "average" players.
i don't consider Byron Jones an average player - he's solid but nowhere near worthy of the highest paid CB in the NFL, .
.The Cowboys themselves did not consider Byron market value..and not convince he was a core player.
Not only did we not ruin our cap with re-signing Byron to such a mega contract, we also successfully (luckily?) found his permanent replacement in Trevor Diggs.