Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
Which would you prefer: To go 10-6, but have all six defeats come at the hands of the Giants, Eagles or Commanders,
or
Go 8-8, but have a clean 6-0 sweep of the Giants, Eagles and Commanders?
And would you stick by your choice for, say, ten years in a row? (Have the Cowboys go 10-6 for ten years in a row, but be 0-60 against the Giants/Eagles Commanders?) (or go 8-8 for ten years in a row, but be 60-0 against the Giants/Eagles/Commanders?)
I would prefer 10-6, because a 10-6 team is much more likely to qualify for the playoffs, by win-loss record, than an 8-8 team. An 8-8 team would still possess all of the head-to-head tiebreakers against WAS, PHI and NYG, but you'd still be just 8-8.
or
Go 8-8, but have a clean 6-0 sweep of the Giants, Eagles and Commanders?
And would you stick by your choice for, say, ten years in a row? (Have the Cowboys go 10-6 for ten years in a row, but be 0-60 against the Giants/Eagles Commanders?) (or go 8-8 for ten years in a row, but be 60-0 against the Giants/Eagles/Commanders?)
I would prefer 10-6, because a 10-6 team is much more likely to qualify for the playoffs, by win-loss record, than an 8-8 team. An 8-8 team would still possess all of the head-to-head tiebreakers against WAS, PHI and NYG, but you'd still be just 8-8.


