YAC, YAC, YAC (Felix's Impact)

percyhoward;2202216 said:
Some guys fit their systems better than others.

It's the other way around. Their QB made their system more YAC friendly imo.
 
There are so many things that go into YAC. Good receiver, good QB, bad tackling defenses, good olines that have guys that can pull well.
 
baj1dallas;2202257 said:
It's the other way around. Their QB made their system more YAC friendly imo.
I hope you're right, and their coach is wrong.
 
baj1dallas;2202257 said:
It's the other way around. Their QB made their system more YAC friendly imo.

The WCO basically invented YAC.

GB runs a WCO.

Favre was very good but even this year GB will have WRs with high YAC.

The reason Welker and Crayton are in there is they catch crossing routes on the move and are generally inside/slot type guys.

T.O. had huge YAC at SF but now has very pedestrian YAC because he catches the ball deep and near the sideline quite a lot, much like Randy-Kate Moss.
 
jterrell;2202496 said:
The WCO basically invented YAC.

GB runs a WCO.
So do Philly and Seattle (both with Pro Bowl QB's) but none of either team's top 3 WR's averaged more than 4.4 YAC. That's six different WCO WR's who didn't even crack the Top 15 in YAC. It's not the system.

Sometimes the simplest explanation is the best one. I think GB's receivers rank high in YAC not because of Favre, or because of the WCO, but because they're good after the catch.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,839
Messages
13,900,236
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top