NFLPA appeal of Rice suspension necessary, and potentially useful
Posted by Mike Florio on September 12, 2014, 2:05 PM EDT
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-suspension-necessary-and-potentially-useful/
Getty Images
On the day
Ray Rice was due to return to the Ravens after his two-game suspension ended, the NFL officially imposed an indefinite suspension on the currently unemployed running back.
After a week of conflicting reports and comments and off-the-record quotes regarding whether Rice lied to the Commissioner, the Commissioner has informed Rice that he essentially lied to the Commissioner. But Rice hasn’t been suspended for lying to the Commissioner; Rice has been suspended a second time for something the NFL knew or should have known Rice did.
For that reason alone, the NFLPA must file a grievance appealing the NFL’s effort to suspend Rice a second time for the same conduct. The NFL had the information, or easily could have gotten the information, necessary for concluding that Rice did what the video shows he did — Rice struck Janay Palmer Rice and knocked her out.
No matter what anyone thinks of Rice or what he did, Rice has rights. And if those rights aren’t defended, a bad precedent will be set, allowing the NFL the unilateral ability to conjure a Mulligan whenever an initial suspension is criticized and some new piece of evidence that they should have had in the first place (and maybe did have) is leaked to the public. For the same reason the NFLPA is fighting the Patriots’ effort to not pay money owed to tight end Aaron Hernandez, the NFLPA must fight this apparent effort to suspend Rice a second time for the same set of facts.
If/when (when) the NFLPA files an appeal, the process of resolving it could generate potentially useful information about what the Ravens and the NFL knew, and when they knew it. With the investigator hired by the league necessarily not independent by virtue of his firm’s many tentacles with the NFL and its teams, the appeal hearing could result in the dissemination of documents and the generation of testimony that will shed considerable light on many of the questions the league has avoided answering.
Things also could get interesting in light of the fact that the NFL essentially has called out Ravens G.M. Ozzie Newsome, a Hall of Fame player who deserves a second bust for his work as a personnel executive. Newsome said Rice didn’t lie. The league says, essentially, that Rice did...