You seem stuck on reading comprehension respectfully. You’re accusing me of something I never said or did. As a matter of fact I was actually talking to someone else and you jumped in. Maybe you should read our exchange to understand better what we are discussing?
Stop with the finger pointing and just answer a question, do you want to move on from Dak or keep him? You speak out of both sides of your mouth.
what they want you to say is dak is the reason we fail every year. hes not hes PART of it but hes not THE reason but hes getting worse each time out in the playoffs. I am probably the wrong fan to be talking to them because I simply dont buy into their stance and Im also not a SB or bust fan and they cant understand that type of fan. Im already past it. Im more concerned with the defensive side of the ball but a change at QB may be in order just to shut them up but dak isnt going anywhere
The question isn’t that simple. If the team is rebuilding then yeah get rid of him. If they are trying to build a playoff team for next year then you keep him and let him play out his contract. I’m not speaking out of both sides you just aren’t understanding what’s being said. I’ve been very clear.
Yeah I know and I won’t. I scapegoat him for Jerry. I refuse to. Because Dak is 30. We haven’t won in 28 years. So if they want to blame a 2 year old Dak have at it. I’ll blame Dak for his poor play. And contributing to our loss. But oh boy do they have something coming if they think just getting of Dak is the answer.
I agree with you on Dak but I don’t think his issues stem from chasing legacy. Especially when the legacy is Romo before him.
The legacy is 5 super bowls and the idea that JJ and Cowboys fans expect a return to glory yesterday. And the longer it goes without happening, the harder it is for Dak to handle that pressure. Romo couldn’t handle it either.
