- Messages
- 61,977
- Reaction score
- 63,103
Nope. "Can I be anal about stuff like what we are discussing?" Yes.You’re a lawyer, aren’t you?
Nope. "Can I be anal about stuff like what we are discussing?" Yes.You’re a lawyer, aren’t you?
Nope. "Can I be anal about stuff like what we are discussing?" Yes.
I am slowing down in my old age.You are good at arguing. Most people here can’t hang.
They did exactly what 80% of you wanted. Give Dak a big over paid contract.
Told other fans they are haters and should be banned.
Don't go pointing fingers. They did what everyone wanted. Don't go throwing stones and hiding your hands now.
More than half this forum has no right to complain or cuss out Jerry.
This is our bed now.
(1)People exaggerate all the time and I'm pretty sure you don't go around trying to question all exaggerations. You can say you do but unless you have proof you do on both sides of this Dak situation I'm going to think like most folks you have a bias and that's cool too.That is your opinion. My opinion is that it is not necessary to exaggerate simply to justify a personal position that does not require defending.
There were some members who stated via posts or threads that they supported Prescott's getting the contract he signed. Why the incorrect assumption that most members did so is a mystery to me.
There are not. I stated as much already:
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/you...tephen-are-idiots.499427/page-2#post-12062877
Any reliable poll is a sampling of any population's opinion. CowboysZone was the population queried in the poll I posted. A sampling is neither hyperbole nor a exaggeration. Additionally, the 350 members you mentioned total far more than the number of members who actually created individual posts and/or threads voicing their opinion of Prescott's contract.
Well. 50/50 is approximately what the poll indicated also.