You know we're not going to agree on this because I'm going to keep bringing this up,,
in the last 33 years Jerry Jones has three, now stack up all the other teams in the last 33 years who have 3 Super Bowls, just leave the drought out of it... it's just about Super Bowls, total Super Bowls, again if they hadn't won one every 10 years instead of three early and then have a drought what's the difference it's still 33 Super Bowls is more than three total championships by our other three pro sports teams here in DFW... So since 1989 how many teams have had three Super Bowl wins in the NFL that's how I look at it I realize we want it but again there are teams that have longer droughts and there are teams who have not won any Super Bowls and there are a whole lot of teams that I've only won one....
Try that on for size,
stop with the theoretical hypotheticals and all the other nonsense because that's why you all have a big problem with this and I just rather look at it is each year is a new year, each year is a one off you never know when it's going to be your cycle..
it's ridiculous to put this all on them because other sports teams have had longer droughts including the chiefs 52 years and then you have to add the ones in have never won a Super Bowl your theory is wrong because most of the teams who are winning are a fraction of the 32 teams it literally is a a handful of teams that are winning all those championships and you know why I know this here's the last little actual fact that you need to remember when we're debating how is it that the Cowboys are on this long drought and still third all time in Super Bowl wins it shows that you lots of teams are not winning Super Bowls that top heavy top five the same teams that were top five ten years ago... The 49ers have had a nice little run here except for the fact that they haven't won a Super Bowl since 1994 and you keep glossing over it even them making a lot of championship games and Super Bowls they haven't won any since 1994... That's two years longer than the Cowboys so stop using several wins and start using proper arguments which would be getting to the NFC championship game and at least making a Super Bowl...
Apparently you didn't read the most important part is if you just changed the word from winning Super Bowls to actually making a Super Bowl then maybe you'd have an argument again the NFC championship games I get it we need to get there we need to get over the hump but those teams are not winning Super Bowls the 32 teams in the NFL are not cycling every 32 years to winning a championship that is not how it works it's the same fraction of teams with an outlier every once in a while....
But most of the teams who are known to have multiple dynasties in our winning Super Bowls are the ones that keep winning Super Bowls in certain cycles the chiefs are new to it but then you add in the Steelers, Packers, Cowboys, 9ers, pats into a certain extent the giants. That is hardly a large portion of the NFL... Yes the cycle over 32 years the is that more teams have made the championship game or at least got to a Super Bowl over that cycle and the Cowboys are in a drought but again the chiefs had a much longer drought it was twice as long and now they've cycled into a nice little run again the Cowboys will eventually get there if they don't they don't but I'm tired of hearing about the past or the future I'm a one year person..
The NFL is full of parity, it is become a week-to-week league during the year and it's a year-to-year league full of one offs, there isn't a lot of carryover especially for the larger part of the NFL...
