Proof
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,973
- Reaction score
- 13,810
"Most starting RBs would have put up similiar numbers or better if they had the same O line zeke has"
WoW...have we not learned that when we put someone else besides Emmit behind that vaunted OL?
WoW...have we not learned that when we put someone else besides DeMarco Murray behind that vaunted OL? Remember Joseph Randle...and he was going to be the replacement of DeMarco Murray at a fraction of the cost?
Zeke was used to be an extra OL to pick pick up the blitz and was the best at it. In addition to catching the ball out the backfield on 3rd down. In addition to running it on 1st and 2nd down. We beat him up and he is a shell of himself.
Joe Gibbs in is 2nd stint with the Commanders spent draft picks and a ton of money on Clinton Portis to try to replicate John Riggins. He was very good in the beginning. But he got beat up over time being miscast as John Riggins and became a shell of himself. Does not mean Portis was not a quality back...just means Gibbs...trying to replicate 80s football....much like Garrett trying to replicate 90s football....could not adjust to todays NFL
ehh. Remember Darren McFadden and Tony Pollard? Point is the large investment in zeke was supposed to produce over the top results when coupled with our formidable line. It hasn’t quite panned out that way and the resources could’ve been better served elsewhere. The production from another back would likely be comparable or at the very least cost/value relative