Just a few things most here who take issue with "Jerry's Way" are missing.
1) Most who have an issue insist on making reference to the past 16yrs since that's the time since our last SB and puts the franchises/Jerry's track record in the worst possible light............
fine lets just look at the past 16 yrs.
Now IF the way the Cowboys are run is soooooooo disfunctional. If it was absolutely the worst way to run a franchise and gives us no chance to win a championship, answer these questions....
- How is it it possible that we have managed to achieve average NFL results over the past 16 yrs? That's right. Average! For all the *****ing and moaning around here over those past 16yrs, you'd think were the Lions or Bengals.
- If it's so unlikley to win a SB with our system, how is it we managed to make it to the final 8 twice in the past 5 yrs? Now we all have our own definitions of what a contender is, but if you playing on the divisional weekend, you've accomplished something. You either had a great regular season and earned a bye, or you won a wild card game. Either way, you're only two wins from the SB. Those 8 teams have a right to claim they were in the mix, in the running.
2) Jerry's way makes sense, if only for one reason. It best or perhaps better qualifies him to make the one key decision that every single NFL franchise owner has to make.
Hire the football people who make the football decisions. In most cases that's one man. Billionaire buys and NFL team and hires a GM to run the show. OK, how did he do that? What qualifies him to do that? What qualifies him to evaluate that man on a continuing basis and decide to fire him. And then what qualifies him to hire the replacement?
So many of you loath how the Cowboys are run and long for the day we have an uninvolved billionaire who'll simply let the pros run the show.
Be careful what you wish for........