I'm not sure I follow the Daniel Snyder reference.How is that working out for Daniel Snyder?
These negotiations aren't easy and they almost always get done right at the deadline. We don't have any real insight into the negotiations with Amari Cooper but from all indications Dak's agent was the one with unrealistic expectations. He wasn't getting lowballed, it was France asking for something out of line with the market. That's his job and he got it for Tannehill, but that doesn't mean Dallas should do it.
Murray was a great decision, a non-generational RB makes no sense to break the bank on him. And Ware was on his what 3rd/4th contract? I don’t really consider an aging player’s situation the same as this the dynamics are totally different.Demarco Murray, Demarcus Ware
At times just pointing at the front office as the source of the problem about losing them is a bit narrow.Where I think the FO fails is with their reluctance to move on from their stars in timely fashion so as to get something substantial for them (see 49ers with Buckner). It inevitably leads to overpaying of some and losing others with no comparable compensation.
The Cowboys are pretty damn good at picking the stars, but having 3 of the 5 top FAs in a given year screaof holding on too long and a lack of succession planning. There has to be an exit strategy for every player on the roster. The Hoodie knows.
I'm not sure I follow the Daniel Snyder reference.
Your post was "If you're nibbling around the edges and it's not happening, that means you have to bowl them over.".
Daniel Snyder is the guy who "bowls people over" and the Commanders are perennial losers even with Snyder "bowling over" a bunch of free agents.
What Dallas does is match the market rate, its what they have done from the Dez Bryant deal (Demaryius Thomas) to Zeke's extension (Todd Gurley). They have done that consistently but it doesn't happen quickly, by nature it normally happens close to the deadlines.
Try all you want, but you won't convince me the front office did the smart thing in trading a 1st rounder for a player and then letting him walk.
My post covered all of the possible outcomes.Sorry, where did Cooper sign?
I'm speaking more about players looking for their first deal after the rookie contract expires. Those are typically the most impactful players in the NFL and at a time in their careers when they are worth the most. Dez? LOL!At times just pointing at the front office as the source of the problem about losing them is a bit narrow.
Some players want to move on. They do not care who pays them. Especially early in their careers.
Sometimes they are older, made their money on their 1st and 2nd contracts but. Not won much and want a ring.
Then they supposedly take less. Not really sure about all that. I think they just want more money.
When you talk about exit strategy for players, ask Dez about that. Not always something one can control. Ask Garrett.
My post covered all of the possible outcomes.
1. Cooper signing elsewhere.
2. Cooper signing with us if we match and beat what the open market offers.
She did, that's sort of why we're no longer seeing one another.
![]()
Coop and Dak’s agents both wanted to wait until the CBA and other comparable contracts were signed. In Coopers case, he was signed to an agency with 2 agents repping him. The agency split and Coop had to take some time to decide which of the two would represent him. In Daks case we all know who Todd France is and what Dak was doing when he made that switch. Byron IMO was never a serious candidate for a long term top of the market deal.
We see stories about the team not being in contact but the reports and quotes from Amari and Daks negotiations illustrate that the players representation wants to exercise all possible leverage. More power to them but it takes 2 to negotiate. I know we think the FO is run by idiots but they literally have no incentive at all to wait till the last second to initiate communication. Deadlines make deals when you negotiate; not when the other party isn’t willing to talk at all.
We see stories about the team not being in contact but the reports and quotes from Amari and Daks negotiations illustrate that the players representation wants to exercise all possible leverage. More power to them but it takes 2 to negotiate. I know we think the FO is run by idiots but they literally have no incentive at all to wait till the last second to initiate communication. Deadlines make deals when you negotiate; not when the other party isn’t willing to talk at all.
I appreciate you looking out brotha!Bumping this thread because you were right, right ahead of time and had to spend the day reading posts saying you weren't.
Dez was a throw away comment.I'm speaking more about players looking for their first deal after the rookie contract expires. Those are typically the most impactful players in the NFL and at a time in their careers when they are worth the most. Dez? LOL!
es, they tried to get that "home town deal" and it blew up in their faces. None of these guys cared or were intimidated by the Cowboys luster or the Joneses bluster. And now Junior will either pay top market rates, or lose the players. He failed.
Remind me Ralph Wiggum, did Dallas lose Amari and Dak?

He just paid 'top rate" for Cooper, as I said he would. Keep failing!
![]()
And why did Cooper's salary cap charge go down and not up? Is that the incompetent disaster scenario you and the others here keep whining about?
What are you referring to here? In your obvious rage, you're rambling.
