Video: Peter King: Cowboys need to compromise and sign Dak Prescott

[blueblood70]

“Do the right thing.”

Please Jerry.. Please sign away your teams future because you have a decent QB and if you have a decent QB you have to give them whatever they want because it’s just way to risky to draft a rookie and hope they could be a good QB too.

Stick with the mediocre plan.

NO Dak needs to compromise..

no one has empathy for his situation as hes been offered fair deals, hes on the FT., UNSIGNED BTW, because he wants far to much money, less years, more guarantees etc etc top 5 deal for atop 10 QB is beyond fair..idc one iota another team paid Goff or wentz a bit more..its in that area code and well daks the only 3 to not at least been on a bench at the SB 2 of the last 3 years 9-7, 10-6(needing us to overpay for a WR for dak, ) , and now 8-8 that rookie season is well in the rearview and 8-8 is front and center..i say to bad so sad and let dak eat the FT and put him on the block for 2021 non exclusive tag and get what you can if he want to dig in..

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

NO Dak needs to compromise..

no one has empathy for his situation as hes been offered fair deals, hes on the FT., UNSIGNED BTW, because he wants far to much money, less years, more guarantees etc etc top 5 deal for atop 10 QB is beyond fair..idc one iota another team paid Goff or wentz a bit more..its in that area code and well daks the only 3 to not at least been on a bench at the SB 2 of the last 3 years 9-7, 10-6(needing us to overpay for a WR for dak, ) , and now 8-8 that rookie season is well in the rearview and 8-8 is front and center..i say to bad so sad and let dak eat the FT and put him on the block for 2021 non exclusive tag and get what you can if he want to dig in..

You don't know what he's been offered.

 

[blueblood70]

Because I think the middle is then meeting Dak at 4 years. Who's to say maybe they want a shorter deal than that?

nah DC FO wanted 6 structured very team friendly dak wants 4 not even in the zip code of team friendly, the middle is FIVE

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

nah DC FO wanted 6 structured very team friendly dak wants 4 not even in the zip code of team friendly, the middle is FIVE

I'm saying who's to say if Dak's side didn't want a deal short than 4? Who's to say the Cowboys didn't want a 6 year deal?

Them meeting in the middle could very well be 4 years. We have no idea.

 

[blueblood70]

You don't know what he's been offered.

NOR DO YOU the 400th thread over 18months thats being argued from what where we all get our info.. so what even bother keep talking about Daks deal of you argue we both dont know ****!~

I still say dak needs his own Dakzone..clutter is all tis back and forth bs gets us..

 

[CATCH17]

I think they will, too. I just wonder why they only blame the team side and not the player.

Not to get OT, but I wonder if Belichick isn't about to put this theory to the test and see if he can win with a cheap QB that isn't making a fortune.

I think maybe they are going at Dallas because it’s so obvious they won’t move on from him so they just need to sign him and be done with it.

They didn’t even have the business awareness to use leverage against him in negotiations.

Dak has been shown no threat he could lose the Cowboy market.

 

[Chocolate Lab]

That's usually the middle. When deal gets done usually its the player and owners having to sacrifice a little.

When did they tell Dak to sacrifice anything? That's the point.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

NOR DO YOU the 400th thread over 18months thats being argued from what where we all get our info.. so what even bother keep talking about Daks deal of you argue we both dont know ****!~

I still say dak needs his own Dakzone..clutter is all tis back and forth bs gets us..

So if you don't know how are you telling him what he's being offered is "fair"?

When did they tell Dak to sacrifice anything? That's the point.

Well that's my point. We don't know if they have or haven't.

 

[blueblood70]

I'm saying who's to say if Dak's side didn't want a deal short than 4? Who's to say the Cowboys didn't want a 6 year deal?

Them meeting in the middle could very well be 4 years. We have no idea.

show me one major contract in the last decade for a QB that was only 3 years NOT A FA or TRADE reup on an older player..?
Teams dont offer those, so if agents choose to throw feathers into the fan and think that would ever be considered, thats not negotiating.. 4-6 years is common place....5 would be a compromise with whatever language they want to out in there like void the 5th year should dak become to MVP and make a SB, void the 4th if he winds a SB before the 4th year?

you know what they wouldn't sign that , Dak and hi agents know that most likely not happening..:_)

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

show me one major contract in the last decade for a QB that was only 3 years NOT A FA or TRADE reup on an older player..?
Teams dont offer those, so if agents choose to throw feathers into the fan and think that would ever be considered, thats not negotiating.. 4-6 years is common place....5 would be a compromise with whatever language they want to out in there like void the 5th year should dak become to MVP and make a SB, void the 4th if he winds a SB before the 4th year?

you know what they wouldn't sign that , Dak and hi agents know that most likely not happening..:_)

Didn't Kirk Cousins just re-up on a 2 year deal?

But that's negotiations.....you offer something the other party wouldn't sign. Then you meet in the middle. What am I missing here?

 

[blueblood70]

So if you don't know how are you telling him what he's being offered is "fair"?



Well that's my point. We don't know if they have or haven't.

yes yes I am I see a top 10 QB in wins and production, I see warts against better competition, hes IMO and many others WHICH MUST INLCUDE HIS EMPLOYERS, That HES NOT WORTH WHAT HES DEMANDING..F THE State of the QB MARKET,..I SEE A MISTAKE CAVIING TO DAKS DEMANDS..

LEAVE HIM ON THE TAG actually look's cheaper and less risk for the FO..

 

[blueblood70]

Didn't Kirk Cousins just re-up on a 2 year deal?

But that's negotiations.....you offer something the other party wouldn't sign. Then you meet in the middle. What am I missing here?

thats AFDTER his 2 FT haul and a HUGE deal.. I meant in similar postion, not happening, they simply extended his deal, not a NEW LTD..using Cousin in any debate makes it invalid..hes showed the world what you get by overpaying for average talent.. he flashes like dak for 3-5 fames then reality's trikes and his true talent shows ie just above average but not great..

sure OVERPay Dak and never win a championship, sound familiar..yup thats the cousins blueprint..yea cant wait

 

[DeaconMoss]

Jordan Love
Jake Fromm
Jalen Hurts

I like this guy

Jacob Eason. He has one thing you can't teach. A rocket arm.
Maybe Kellen can work on his feet and adapt to put some more touch on the ball.
But he has the tools to maybe develop into a starter. If he can handle the mental side, the gifts are there.

 

[America's Cowboy]

“Do the right thing.”

Please Jerry.. Please sign away your teams future because you have a decent QB and if you have a decent QB you have to give them whatever they want because it’s just way to risky to draft a rookie and hope they could be a good QB too.

Stick with the mediocre plan.

 

[OmerV]

thats AFDTER his 2 FT haul and a HUGE deal.. I meant in similar postion, not happening, they simply extended his deal, not a NEW LTD..using Cousin in any debate makes it invalid..hes showed the world what you get by overpaying for average talent.. he flashes like dak for 3-5 fames then reality's trikes and his true talent shows ie just above average but not great..

sure OVERPay Dak and never win a championship, sound familiar..yup thats the cousins blueprint..yea cant wait

The flaw with this thinking, as always, is that it is based on the false notion that winning and losing is solely on the QB. But the team as a whole does matter, and the reality is throughout history there have been lesser QBs than Dak and Cousins have won Super Bowls, and also there have also been very capable QBs that, if not for one season, would be treated as not being capable of winning a Super Bowl. To not recognize these things is a to take a simplistic view that is designed more to fit a narrative than to fit reality.

 

[CowboyStar88]

What about them?

All their names start with a J?

 

[sean10mm]

I think the Cowboys messed it up regardless of what you think of Dak.

If the Cowboys thought he was the man all along, they should have tried much harder to lock him up long term much sooner, before the last round of huge QB contracts dropped to inflate the market. Basically the second the CBA allowed they should have offered him what was the market peak 2 years ago. Fast forward and multiple new blockbuster contracts dropped for QBs and now he wants to be at or beyond THOSE.

Instead it seemed like they dawdled for a year or two and let the market massively inflate before SERIOUSLY trying to make a deal. It's not like the 2019 season changed anybody's mind about Dak either way; whichever camp you started in is probably the one you finished in.

On the flipside, if they thought Dak would never be the man, they should have just traded him by now. Or decided to have him play under the tag in 2020 and not even think about negotiating a new contract with him at this point. They're in between [censored] and getting off the pot; everything points to them not having a strategy and just sort of winging it.

It's one thing for us to argue about if Dak should stay or go, and at what price. But the Cowboys should have made a decision about it like 2 years ago, yet they aren't really acting like it.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

“Do the right thing.”

Please Jerry.. Please sign away your teams future because you have a decent QB and if you have a decent QB you have to give them whatever they want because it’s just way to risky to draft a rookie and hope they could be a good QB too.

Stick with the mediocre plan.

Peter and Steven Smith big Dak supporters leave one to wonder why?
lol....anyway It’s April 17th and Jerry still doesn’t want to give Dak the deal he wants? Lmao I was told franchise QBs get signed no matter what....

 

[Typhus]

Because they know what the status quo thing to do is and eventually the Cowboys will give into that as well.


That is why we have the QB market we have today.. Because all these teams agreed that it’s the right thing to do to make their QB the highest paid player in the league if they aren’t completely terrible.

That is why we will pay Dak Prescott elite QB money and we won’t even have an elite QB.

They gave themselves no leverage in negotiations when they had the chance too but now they look like fools and everyone knows they are going to cave including Dak and his agent.

Dak wins and the Cowboys lose.

You forgot the fans,, they lose as well,, that is the fans that want championships... there are plenty of fans that support the agenda,, Jerrys agenda of just being good enough
to entertain the masses,, that's about 8-8.

 

[Philmonroe]

Apparently Jerry doesn't agree that Dak is merely "mediocre". Besides, a lot of reports suggest it is the Cowboys that are asking Dak to accept what they want, being a longer term contract than has been typical for other QBs.

So you’re one of these people that believe people’s words and not actions as long as it goes with your narrative types I see. If Jerry agreed Dak would be signed by now what’s the holdup if he truly believed his words?