WillieBeamen
BoysfanfromNY
- Messages
- 15,272
- Reaction score
- 44,064
To me it sounds like they are maintaining their current offer.I’m actually surprised they are acknowledging it.
LOL...…..nobody needs analytics for that.
What are the analytics for making your RB the highest paid back in the NFL?
LOL...…..nobody needs analytics for that.
What are the analytics for making your RB the highest paid back in the NFL?
From what Im to understand the money is agreed upon. Its the years 4 VS 5. They want 5. I think 4 is better anyways. Dak is tied to McCarthy. McCarthy's deal is 5 years, but coaches are usually fired the year before their contract is up if they arent going to be kept. If we reach point, then it is time for a rebuild and Prescott will be entering his 30's. At which point he comes off your books when you are hiring a new HCTo me it sounds like they are maintaining their current offer.
Dak will either have to cave, or sign the tender
Well we do have a bus driver and a good RBThat's why I always liked Bill Parcells team building methods. He liked to build up on the defensive side of the ball, get a good RB and put a bus driver at QB.
The analytics say he was when he signed the deal. The analytics also say, next year Dak won't be the highest paid QB in the NFL if he signs a deal this year making him the highest paid QB. Not sure what the point is.The analytics say we don't have the highest paid back in the NFL
I'm not going to do it because I'm lazy but I'd like to see the cap % allocated to starting QB over the last 15 years......
From what Im to understand the money is agreed upon. Its the years 4 VS 5. They want 5. I think 4 is better anyways. Dak is tied to McCarthy. McCarthy's deal is 5 years, but coaches are usually fired the year before their contract is up if they arent going to be kept. If we reach point, then it is time for a rebuild and Prescott will be entering his 30's. At which point he comes off your books when you are hiring a new HC