Opinion: Next year's DC is Mike Zimmer

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,068
Reaction score
20,265
Is he better than Mike Nolan?


Personally, some guys are just better in coordinator roles. Wade Phillips? Awful HC, decent DC. Norv Turner? Meh HC, pretty solid OC. Zimmer could be in that boat.
Maybe. I just get the feeling that Zimmer doesn’t have the same level of energy as he did when he was with the Cowboys. I don’t think the “will” is there. I would rather go with a young guy who is a prodigy.

A Sean Lee type of guy might do wonders as a true coach. Great mind. look at what the Tennessee head coach is doing for that team. (Vrabel)

McVay lit it up as a young coach. We need a guy who has the energy to turn this defense around.
 

Hagman

Put Niland and Green in the ROH
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
7,765
Mike Nolan. And the year after that, and the year after that. High level performance is not a big deal here.

giphy.gif
 

Parcells4Life

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
9,364
The NFL has accurately evaluated Mike Nolan the past 12 years or so.
He wasn’t hired to give us a top 5 defense. He was hired to get more pressure and turnovers which give the high powered offense more chances to score.

The NFL has evaluated under those 2 statistics to be very good most years
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
17,739
Reaction score
24,476
I would rather go with a young guy who is a prodigy.
I love that type of thinking.

Unfortunately, those guys don't exist. The "brilliant minds" in football have all shifted towards the offense and the advantages that the game and rules have shifted to.

It's coming though, it's always cyclical. I just don't think we're there yet.

Which is why I'd go with Venables if I could get whoever I wanted.

One, he's the intense leader this defense needs.

Two, he's very good at his job.

Two B, no one has more experience game planning and adjusting to the wide variety of spread offense concepts. Venables is old-school tough and (fundamentally) sound, but still able to play chess with modern offenses.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
17,739
Reaction score
24,476
He wasn’t hired to give us a top 5 defense. He was hired to get more pressure and turnovers which give the high powered offense more chances to score.
He's not that guy.

Also, he was hired because of his relationship with McCarthy.No one had given him a DC job since 2014. This league is desperate for competent DC's and he was available that whole time.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,068
Reaction score
20,265
I love that type of thinking.

Unfortunately, those guys don't exist. The "brilliant minds" in football have all shifted towards the offense and the advantages that the game and rules have shifted to.

It's coming though, it's always cyclical. I just don't think we're there yet.

Which is why I'd go with Venables if I could get whoever I wanted.

One, he's the intense leader this defense needs.

Two, he's very good at his job.

Two B, no one has more experience game planning and adjusting to the wide variety of spread offense concepts. Venables is old-school tough and (fundamentally) sound, but still able to play chess with modern offenses.
I wouldn’t object to that path. I think it would be better than Zimmer.

Another advantage to bringing in new blood from the college ranks is they tend to know the talent in the pool someone else might miss.
 
Top