News: Fox: Cowboys shouldn't focus on quarterback during 2021 draft, Troy Aikman says

[Corso]

Your right. I misread it. I thought it said “ should” . Not shouldn’t . I was just driving by. My bad!!

Lol, no worries!

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Pity is nice, pity is generous, but pity doesn't get paid!
New hit Dak-Mafia movie coming this Spring at a Draft room near you.....
X-Rated...for adults that aren't under the Dak-Crush syndrome....

 

[Runwildboys]

lol.. I’d hate to move on from Dak and all the success he brings to the franchise.

I’d hate to miss out on a wildcard win every 5 years after we finally put a great team around him.

Do you think we would have lost those games earlier this season, if we had even an average defense? I don't think so.

 

[Runwildboys]

what are you as a fake gm willing to pay Dak for being "Good Enough" thats the issue sure you can win with him but we might be talking 37-40mil for good enough

however troys right ONLY if we arent taking Lawrence,,i dont think the gaps big enough between Fields and the next guys like Trask ec..so we trade down stay in top 10 maybe grab trask or similar plus get all the defenders we want, Non exclusive Tag Dak if hes still trying to be non team friendly, if he plays great we develop our draft pick if he holds out we seek trades and start the new era..have a boat load of picks for 2022 and jettison the big contracts for 2022 and really be like a 2016 reboot..

lots of options are great. If Lawerence is there well you should consider him no doubt

What's up with calling someone "fake GM" for expressing his opinion, but acting like you're not a "fake GM" when you express yours?

 

[Runwildboys]

We've had a decent defense every year but this year and we see where he's gotten. The d was top half of the league most of the time he's been here so that's not it.

I don't think we've had a decent defense. Don't forget, the offense was covering up for a lot of the defense's liabilities, with ToP for probably most of that time. Any time the defense was on the field too long, they got chewed up and spit out.

 

[blueblood70]

What's up with calling someone "fake GM" for expressing his opinion, but acting like you're not a "fake GM" when you express yours?

um you are a fake GM when you are making hypothetical decsions for team from your keyboard you are the very definition of a fake GM..not sure how that offends anyone most in here are all know it all overly opinionated egomaniacal fans who fee they know whats best for their football teams..

common knowledge if you are playing something you are not, you are fake..

did you dress up up Jerry GM for Halloween.

 

[Corso]

What's up with calling someone "fake GM" for expressing his opinion, but acting like you're not a "fake GM" when you express yours?

He used to not post like this IIRC. It's kind of weird.

 

[blueblood70]

Do you think we would have lost those games earlier this season, if we had even an average defense? I don't think so.

true but the other side of the coin we nearly beat Philly and PB with our 4th string QBS whats that say for Dak LOL so we dont need him we draft a guy use a vet as bridge draft and get Defensive players and then we dont need to score 35 a game

 

[Runwildboys]

um you are a fake GM when you are making hypothetical decsions for team from your keyboard you are the very definition of a fake GM..not sure how that offends anyone most in here are all know it all overly opinionated egomaniacal fans who fee they know whats best for their football teams..

common knowledge if you are playing something you are not, you are fake..

did you dress up up Jerry GM for Halloween.

I'm not pretending to make the decisions. I'm stating what I believe the better option is. There's a big difference, which is very easy to see....and yet still, you're doing the same thing, but you don't seem to think you're a "fake GM". Talk about egomaniacal.

 

[America's Cowboy]

He must feel the Cowboys should make Dak an offer he can't refuse.

Agreed, but Dak's injury works in Jerry's and Stephen's favor. Should be a highly but reasonable (with injury protection clauses) contract .

 

[Philmonroe]

I don't think we've had a decent defense. Don't forget, the offense was covering up for a lot of the defense's liabilities, with ToP for probably most of that time. Any time the defense was on the field too long, they got chewed up and spit out.

Using that logic anytime the D held a team down points wise Top 10 and the offense didn't score. We saw many of those games last year for example.

 

[blueblood70]

I'm not pretending to make the decisions. I'm stating what I believe the better option is. There's a big difference, which is very easy to see....and yet still, you're doing the same thing, but you don't seem to think you're a "fake GM". Talk about egomaniacal.

IM not claiming be GM and i didnt make up the terms like armchair qb or backseat driver and for sure internet GM are Fake GMs especially whn they are lettings us know Jerry and his giant staff of actual Pro scouts and coaches have been doing it wrong and they can do it better..

you are playing GM ie Fake GM..

now answer the question instead of butthurt responses..

 

[Corso]

Using that logic anytime the D held a team down points wise Top 10 and the offense didn't score. We saw many of those games last year for example.

Well... tbf, along with the offense consistently having the worst field position all year long, almost never a plus in tunrovers and some of the worst specials teams work ever seen.

 

[America's Cowboy]

He used to not post like this IIRC. It's kind of weird.

Greg is playing mind tricks. That's one of his old specialties.

 

[Corso]

Greg is playing mind tricks. That's one of his old specialties.

His name is Greg too?! I thought that was @Diehardblues this whole time.

 

[Runwildboys]

true but the other side of the coin we nearly beat Philly and PB with our 4th string QBS whats that say for Dak LOL so we dont need him we draft a guy use a vet as bridge draft and get Defensive players and then we dont need to score 35 a game

"Nearly beat", which means we probably would have beaten them with Dak. If we take a QB with the first pick, we have at least one less high pick to select defense, and there's far from any guarantee that said QB will work out in the NFL.

I'm not saying it can't work to pick the top QB, if given the opportunity. I'm just saying I find it more likely, and a safer bet to stick with Dak.

 

[conner01]

He must have joined the "Dak Mafia".

That changes the second we get the top pick
It would be foolish to focus on a QB at 3
Not so foolish at one though

 

[OmerV]

His name is Greg too?! I thought that was @Diehardblues this whole time.

Is this the guy?

 

[DoctorChicken]

I don’t question Dak’s talent. I question an incompetent Front Office and their ability of putting talent around him, along with paying him his deserved salary.

Lawrence gives you the best QB prospect since Peyton Manning on a rookie contract. If you have that chance, take the gamble. That’s what anyone with a winning mindset would do. This game is not the place for people who want to take the safe route.

And I say this as a person who thinks Dak is worth every penny he commands.

 

[Corso]

That changes the second we get the top pick
It would be foolish to focus on a QB at 3
Not so foolish at one though

Wholeheartedly agree.