Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,395
- Reaction score
- 43,055
I’m with you. I’m partial to parsons but if you don’t take Sewell or parsons at 3-5 you’re missing out on biggest prospectsI agree with Sewell or trade down. I wouldn't want to trade down too far though. Missing out on Sewell, Parsons, or any of the other high ranked D guys would suck pretty badly.
There are no defensive studs but Penei looks like a franchise cornerstone to me, a generational talent at a position we need it. Penei, LG, Biadish, Martin, Collins. Yes, please!
Yeah, that'd be the lineup until Tyron retires. You're right. No-brainer.If we go that route I like the look of Smith, sewell, Biadasz, Martin, Collins. That could get our line back to dominance immediately, and leave possibilities down the road if Tyron has issues. But if someone offers us multiple premium picks for our pick, I think that's a no brainer.
Pretty much this.If we go that route I like the look of Smith, sewell, Biadasz, Martin, Collins. That could get our line back to dominance immediately, and leave possibilities down the road if Tyron has issues. But if someone offers us multiple premium picks for our pick, I think that's a no brainer.
Pretty much this.
You don't necessarily want to draft a guard at 3, but it makes the OL so strong I think it's the easy choice if you're staying put.
Agreed. G is the short-term play.I don't think he has to start at G and if he does it'd be short term. He has perennial pro bowl potential at LT so I don't think he'd stay at G long if they started him there.
Penei, Collins back at LG, Biadasz, Martin and Connor at RT. Win win scenario.There are no defensive studs but Penei looks like a franchise cornerstone to me, a generational talent at a position we need it. Penei, LG, Biadish, Martin, Collins. Yes, please!
NoPenei, Collins back at LG, Biadasz, Martin and Connor at RT. Win win scenario.