buybuydandavis
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,592
- Reaction score
- 21,591
There’s many fans who appear to be divided on whether it’s our QB or defense holding us back from more success. And it’s a fair argument .
Im curious how fans determine these factors. I mean how do they know for a fact if a team is struggling to go further in the playoffs, etc is because of their QB or other contributing factors.
We know good QB’s can be on bad teams and bad QB’s can be on good teams. I’d be curious of some of the examples out there where bad QB’s are holding back good teams and bad teams are holding back good QB’s.
If any player gets better, the team gets better. Dak has been a better QB than the defense has been a defense since Dak joined the team.
But in a capped league, "who is holding the team back" is more than who plays better, it's a question of bang for your buck.
On his rookie contract, Dak was probably the best value proposition in the league. Far from holding us back, his cheap contract kept got us to the playoffs 2/4 years instead of entirely cratering as we ate dead money on Tony and bad contracts like Dez and Terrance.
At 40mil, is Dak still a value proposition? I doubt it. I consider Dak in the top 6-10 QBs. It's not his play. It's the value for cap dollar I doubt. I think the QB market is a bubble.
This doesn't change just because the defense stinks and is a worse value proposition. A bad contract isn't justified because we have worse contracts on the team, or signed worse contracts in the past.
(But if the cap balloons, 40mil for Dak could be cheap. DLaw's contract could look better too. They're very good players. Our best besides Martin. Cooper is up there too. Collins. Tyron is a better player when healthy, but that hasn't been so often.)