Fish on The Fan

So, they get to 10 and 2-4 are all still there. Do they trade with the Pats and hope one of them is there at 15? In a shallow draft like this one, all 3 could come off the board and then who's the fallback pick. Or do they trade again?
 
So, they get to 10 and 2-4 are all still there. Do they trade with the Pats and hope one of them is there at 15? In a shallow draft like this one, all 3 could come off the board and then who's the fallback pick. Or do they trade again?

Good Question! because all 3 could be gone. Do you trade back again and take the DT from the tides or one of the top S.
 
Not sure I completely agree with this take. We don’t know what the make up of the starting 5 will be in the secondary or on the line. One could make the argument that Anthony Brown would be your starter across from diggs especially with new staff coming in

if a chance at Sewell is there you got to take him. He probably unseats someone on line day 1. Slater I’m not sure about but I don’t think there’s a large gap between the 2.

that’s said I’m in the LB camp with first pick or a trade down but if it ends up being CB I won’t be upset. They are all huge needs along with 1 tech.

I just don’t believe horn and Surtain are these can’t miss prospects and are head and shoulders above cbs like melonfeu ? Or equivalent

but I guess you can make same argument with LB

Star, if Brown or Lewis starts at CB we're in trouble, we've seen him get beat like a drum already, if Smith and Collins are back and plays well, Sewell and Slater sit, moving either to gaurd becomes a question.
 
Star, if Brown or Lewis starts at CB we're in trouble, we've seen him get beat like a drum already, if Smith and Collins are back and plays well, Sewell and Slater sit, moving either to gaurd becomes a question.

lewis definitely will be your slot corner the only question is whether they go with brown or not.which I’m not sure I want .

There’s no guarantee that Surtain or Horn start right away or even can have a lot of success. Horn is aggressive and as a rookie I see him being a yellow flag magnet and Surtain like Diggs played with a ton of talent and will have growing pains.

yes CB is important. I think we need 2 of them I just don’t know it has to be at #10.

I think OL needs to be addressed as the health of smith and Collins are a ? Mark.either of the 2 can kick Collins inside and bench Williams . I think I read slater can play multiple positions on line

I agree that brown and Lewis were toast in past but how much of that is scheme and how much of it is lackluster front 7 activity I guess those are huge question marks

again I’m on the LB first train and either Parsons or Collins or Bolton is ok with me. Maybe even Cox and if 2 of the 4 candidates are available at 10 why not trade down?

I feel like LB is every bit the liability the secondary is
 
lewis definitely will be your slot corner the only question is whether they go with brown or not.which I’m not sure I want .

There’s no guarantee that Surtain or Horn start right away or even can have a lot of success. Horn is aggressive and as a rookie I see him being a yellow flag magnet and Surtain like Diggs played with a ton of talent and will have growing pains.

yes CB is important. I think we need 2 of them I just don’t know it has to be at #10.

I think OL needs to be addressed as the health of smith and Collins are a ? Mark.either of the 2 can kick Collins inside and bench Williams . I think I read slater can play multiple positions on line

I agree that brown and Lewis were toast in past but how much of that is scheme and how much of it is lackluster front 7 activity I guess those are huge question marks

again I’m on the LB first train and either Parsons or Collins or Bolton is ok with me. Maybe even Cox and if 2 of the 4 candidates are available at 10 why not trade down?

I feel like LB is every bit the liability the secondary is
There's no sure thing with Sewell or Slater and There's no immediate need on the O line, so you want to draft Sewell or Slater as a depth piece? Lewis and Brown were average since they've been here.
 
There's no sure thing with Sewell or Slater and There's no immediate need on the O line, so you want to draft Sewell or Slater as a depth piece?

Top 10 pick if we stay at that slot, needs to hit the field running. Not sitting on the pine.
 
There's no sure thing with Sewell or Slater and There's no immediate need on the O line, so you want to draft Sewell or Slater as a depth piece? Lewis and Brown were average since they've been here.
There’s no sure thing with anyone you draft. There’s no sure thing at CB either. I don’t think drafting Sewell or Slater is depth in fact I think drafting them sits a current starter again my preference is LB at 10 or trade down but this draft is not about #10 it’s about the entire draft. We need a 1 tech to go with 2 corners and a LB and OL and we got 10 picks to get an improved roster
 
There’s no sure thing with anyone you draft. There’s no sure thing at CB either. I don’t think drafting Sewell or Slater is depth in fact I think drafting them sits a current starter again my preference is LB at 10 or trade down but this draft is not about #10 it’s about the entire draft. We need a 1 tech to go with 2 corners and a LB and OL and we got 10 picks to get an improved roster[/QUOTE
I don't see a worth the 10th, what starter are you sitting for Sewell or Slater?
 

you will sit Conner Williams by kicking Collins inside. Heck Slater can play multiple spots but I think you are focusing too much on the line and not about what I have said my preference is LB or trade down

I won’t be upset if CB is the pick most mocks have us taking Surtain and I won’t be upset if they take OL there is too many uncertainties

the only thing that will tick me off is not addressing LB. Smith is average at best and LVE worries me health wise
 
you will sit Conner Williams by kicking Collins inside. Heck Slater can play multiple spots but I think you are focusing too much on the line and not about what I have said my preference is LB or trade down

I won’t be upset if CB is the pick most mocks have us taking Surtain and I won’t be upset if they take OL there is too many uncertainties

the only thing that will tick me off is not addressing LB. Smith is average at best and LVE worries me health wise

What's says Collins' good inside And on the left side? A lot of moving on the O line. I'm not ignoring the lb move down, it's not something I would do, because I believe CB is the bigger hole of the two, moving back into the first after getting Surtain is where I'd address linebacker if one of the top 3 are still there
 
What's says Collins' good inside And on the left side? A lot of moving on the O line. I'm not ignoring the lb move down, it's not something I would do, because I believe CB is the bigger hole of the two, moving back into the first after getting Surtain is where I'd address linebacker if one of the top 3 are still there
Well see what happens you sure have a lot of faith in Surtain I think he like Diggs benefited from a damn good defense and will struggle some in pros but that said if he’s the luck I’m ok with it
 
Well see what happens you sure have a lot of faith in Surtain I think he like Diggs benefited from a damn good defense and will struggle some in pros but that said if he’s the luck I’m ok with it

It's not about faith in Surtain it's about having a hole at a premium and important position
 
It's not about faith in Surtain it's about having a hole at a premium and important position
That can be filled with Surtain or someone in round 2 that’s all I’m saying
 
That can be filled with Surtain or someone in round 2 that’s all I’m saying
Round 2 ? Who? You taking a flyer on Farley with the injury history he has and here? The percentage of that player being a starter falls greatly. Yrs I know Diggs, but he was a player that some thought could be a first, don't see that in this draft.
 
Round 2 ? Who? You taking a flyer on Farley with the injury history he has and here? The percentage of that player being a starter falls greatly. Yrs I know Diggs, but he was a player that some thought could be a first, don't see that in this draft.
Well see Dre you may very well end up right. And again I’m ok with it if you are . I don’t really know that cowboy history of drafting for need has been that stellar. The good thing is we got a bunch of needs so error margin is larger

I surely don’t want to see a Claiborne repeat or a taco repeat. I want LB one that can play downhill and has 2 good legs. To answer your question though Farley has injury concerns I wouldn’t take him unless he fell to round 3. I’d be ok with Melonfonu who the cowboys have been connected to or even safety
 
Last edited:
Well see Dre you may very well end up right. And again I’m ok with it if you are . I don’t really know that cowboy history of drafting for need has been that stellar. The good thing is we got a bunch of needs so error margin is larger

I surely don’t want to see a Claiborne repeat or a taco repeat. I want LB one that can play downhill and has 2 good legs. To answer your question though Farley has injury concerns I wouldn’t take him unless he fell to round 3. I’d be ok with Melonfonu who the cowboys have been connected to or even safety

I'm with you at linebacker, I want the corner first though. the main problem is the FO wont address some of there needs in FA so that they can take BPA players no matter position.
 
He was talking earlier on The Fan today. This may be just conjecture on his part, so take it for what it’s worth, but he says that he thinks the Cowboys “final four” that they may realistically have a chance of drafting would be listed in this order:

1. Sewell
2. Slater
3. Surtain
4. Horn

He suggests that if any of these guys are there (or all of them for that matter) that if we pick at #10 that we would take one of them IN THAT ORDER.

He suggested that the Cowboys believe that Pitts will be long gone before the Cowboys pick.




EVERYTHING FISH SAYS IS CONJECTURE OR SPECULATION!
.

.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
475,617
Messages
14,627,160
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top