News: ESPN Analyst Has Blunt Message For Dak Prescott, Cowboys

No! The Pats went undefeated in 2007. We're talking 2016. The Pats won the SB on an amazing comeback against Atlanta. I didn't think the Cowboys were winning the SB in 2016, but it was one of the years I thought they had a chance at doing that. That's how good we were. 2007, 2014, and 2016 were the only years the Cowboys were legit contenders since their last SB win in 1995.
I’d argue we had a shot in 1996 . We were still good enough to have beaten Panthers and Packers in playoffs.

But the distractions from Irvin and Williams in the hotel incident derailed the game in Carolina . And by then Switzer had lost all discipline within the team. But that team was still talented enough to make a deeper run.
 
No that's not what you initially said....let me remind you what you said:



You said nothing about "making him look good in those losses" or whatever narrative you're trying to spin. Damn...the spin doctor attempting to push goal posts back.....not gonna work here though.
Let me be clear.

You come off as being perfectly satisfied with Cowboys losses as long as Dak gives you pretty stats to fall asleep to at night. You go as far as saying somebody is "sick" if they are happy the Cowboys win, but Dak plays bad. That implies that a certain criteria has to be met from your favorite player before you can be happy with a Cowboys win.
 
1. Tannenbaum never played a down of football in the NFL. Just another talking head, who are wrong about as much as they are right.
2. He's not saying anything that hasn't been said over and over again, both here and in the media.
3. Payton Manning lost his first 4 playoff games. But ended up winning a SB (his defense won the other, he was crap in the second "win"). So Dak has already won more playoff games than a future HOF player. Dan Marino went to ONE Super Bowl, which he lost. HOF player.
4. Quarterbacks get too much credit and too much blame, that's just how it is, saying "Dak hasn't done xxx.." could be said about dozens of other NFL quarterbacks.
5. "We can sit here and figure out exactly what they have to be, but at the end of the day they paid him $140 million. He better go play better against playoff football teams.”
Same old same old, a player gets a big contract and now he's suddenly better than he ever was, right? NOTHING is guaranteed, Drew Brees got a big contract after his one SB win, but the people around here think Brees was one of the greatest ever still, despite his "getting paid" he never won a SB again.

Just another "bash Dak" post, with the same comments, both for and against Dak repeated over and over and over and over...
 
Last edited:
Its sick for you to hope the Cowboys win in spite of Dak or any player on this team. Its just....weird.....
Everyone is seeing you say this.....

I don't need players to meet a certain criteria before I am happy with a win. I am happy with a win regardless, but you on the other hand.......
 
km
Everyone is seeing you say this.....

I don't need players to meet a certain criteria before I am happy with a win. I am happy with a win regardless, but you on the other hand.......
No, that's not what you are saying. You're saying you HOPE Dak sucks in wins because you can enjoy the win. That's what's sick about it. Keep up.
 
km
Let me be clear.

You come off as being perfectly satisfied with Cowboys losses as long as Dak gives you pretty stats to fall asleep to at night. You go as far as saying somebody is "sick" if they are happy the Cowboys win, but Dak plays bad. That implies that a certain criteria has to be met from your favorite player before you can be happy with a Cowboys win.
Oh ok I don't know how I "come off" but since you're having issues here I'll let you know. All I care about is a W. Whether Dak is good in it or not. I don't care who's good in W's....Is it clear for you now?
 
km

No, that's not what you are saying. You're saying you HOPE Dak sucks in wins because you can enjoy the win. That's what's sick about it. Keep up.
I would like you to provide me with the quotes of me saying that, please and thank you.
 
km

Oh ok I don't know how I "come off" but since you're having issues here I'll let you know. All I care about is a W. Whether Dak is good in it or not. I don't care who's good in W's....Is it clear for you now?
So, you're "sick" to then?

Because you just told me that if I'm happy with a win while Dak played bad then I'm "sick" for being happy about that win.
 
That's not what I said. I said you're sick for hoping for W's just as long as Dak plays bad. :lmao2:
I'll ask again...

Please, provide the quotes of me saying that. You won't, because you're a fraud and resorts to making things up, but I'll ask anyways.
 
th
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,310
Messages
13,865,259
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top