News: ESPN Analyst Has Blunt Message For Dak Prescott, Cowboys

MountaineerCowboy said:
It's only been a quarter of a century. You can keep getting your hopes up just to be let down if you want. I'll wait until I see it on the field.
Click to expand...

referring specifically to your dak stats. i’m well aware of the cowboys overall struggles through the years. and yes i’ll get my hopes up when i feel it’s warranted.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
I told you I don't care about the excuses ya'll will surely make to take the heat off your GOAT. I meant it.
Click to expand...
Oh ok. But Romo got every excuse. The defense gets every excuse. Just the the quarterback. You don’t like dak. And it has nothing to do with football.
 
phildadon86 said:
Oh ok. But Romo got every excuse. The defense gets every excuse. Just the the quarterback. You don’t like dak. And it has nothing to do with football.
Click to expand...
Romo shouldn't have the excuses either.

Dak is a loser just like Romo until he proves otherwise. Again, he has to earn it before I crown him.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Romo shouldn't have the excuses either.

Dak is a loser just like Romo until he proves otherwise. Again, he has to earn it before I crown him.
Click to expand...
ahhh, I remember. unless you win superbowl they are all losers. I kind of forgot that about you

yep Marino is a loser and dilfer is a winner posts... how can anyone forget :thumbup:
 
CowboysFaninHouston said:
ahhh, I remember. unless you win superbowl they are all losers. I kind of forgot that about you

yep Marino is a loser and dilfer is a winner posts... how can anyone forget :thumbup:
Click to expand...
I mean, yeah, that is factually 100% accurate. It cannot be disputed.

You think this is a "gotcha" type of thing, but it's literally fact lol
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Romo shouldn't have the excuses either.

Dak is a loser just like Romo until he proves otherwise. Again, he has to earn it before I crown him.
Click to expand...
Your definition of loser, and winner, are totally different than mine. You don’t have to win something to be a winner. And you don’t have to lose something to be a loser.
 
Whirlwin said:
Your definition of loser, and winner, are totally different than mine. You don’t have to win something to be a winner. And you don’t have to lose something to be a loser.
Click to expand...
We have different opinions on that when it comes to sports, and that's okay.
 
Whirlwin said:
I think it’s a difference of opinion on one particular player
Click to expand...
No. In sports there are winners and losers. Somebody has to win and somebody has to lose.

If you're not a winner then you are the loser. That's with any player. You can have a HOF career, but if you didn't win a championship then you are not a winner.

Again, you don't have to agree, and it's okay for us to have different opinions on it.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
I mean, yeah, that is factually 100% accurate. It cannot be disputed.
Click to expand...
MountaineerCowboy said:
We have different opinions on that when it comes to sports, and that's okay.
Click to expand...
wait, you say its 100% factual...then you say its an opinion..

like I said, you respond to each post as you please because you want to win an argument (argument in your mind). you are trying to live on both sides of the fence.

so is it factual? or opinion?

go ahead spin away
 
CowboysFaninHouston said:
wait, you say its 100% factual...then you say its an opinion..

like I said, you respond to each post as you please because you want to win an argument. you are trying to live on both sides of the fence.

so is it factual? or opinion?

go ahead spin away
Click to expand...
Well, that wasn't in responds to you but.....

What you said about Marino and Dilfer is 100% factual. Your opinion of it can be whatever you want it to be. It doesn't change the fact that one has won and the other has not.

Get with the program. This isn't as hard as you're making it seem.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
No. In sports there are winners and losers. Somebody has to win and somebody has to lose.

If you're not a winner then you are the loser. That's with any player. You can have a HOF career, but if you didn't win a championship then you are not a winner.

Again, you don't have to agree, and it's okay for us to have different opinions on it.
Click to expand...
Yes someone Hass to win someone has to lose. Tennis baseball football. It still takes a team behind you. But if you win it doesn’t make you a winner. Just like if you lose. There’s a lot more that goes into being a winner then winning something. That’s life that’s more than sports . So I totally without a doubt totally totally totally disagreed. With your analogy of winning and losing. I actually feel bad that you don’t understand what it really means to be a winner.I lost the tennis match. I must be a loser. For that moment or life in general. Either way you’re not a loser. You just scored less points
 
When will this D finally step up and make plays in the playoffs? I recall the Rams gashing us for over 200 yards with a no name RB. Packers throwing deep bombs and AR running like a loose dog on us. A D that was a historic history low last year. I've never seen a QB carry all 3 phases of football to a SB, playoffs yeah but never a SB.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
Well, that wasn't in responds to you but.....

What you said about Marino and Dilfer is 100% factual. Your opinion of it can be whatever you want it to be. It doesn't change the fact that one has won and the other has not.

Get with the program. This isn't as hard as you're making it seem.
Click to expand...
Yes it is hard. Because obviously you’re not getting it. But I won’t bring up the subject again. about winning or losing with you. I don’t think it’s tunnel vision. I think it’s just lack of maturity.
 
lostar2009 said:
When will this D finally step up and make plays in the playoffs? I recall the Rams gashing us for over 200 yards with a no name RB. Packers throwing deep bombs and AR running like a loose dog on us. A D that was a historic history low last year. I've never seen a QB carry all 3 phases of football to a SB, playoffs yeah but never a SB.
Click to expand...
This team has been getting destroyed on the defense of the middle for the last 15 years. Without a defensive tackle middle linebacker strong safety you will never win in this league. And make no mistake about it .that doesn’t mean you’re a loser. LOL
 
Future said:
Those facts are entirely irrelevant because a) they're not predictive and b) they're not compared to other quarterbacks and teams .

The Bucs were 1-5 against playoff teams in the regular season last year. By my math, that's a considerably worse win percentage than 5-13.
Click to expand...

Those facts are completely relevant because they are a significant part of the reasoning behind why we are not winning.

The Bucs can deal with whatever issues they have. I don't care because that's not my team. But the Cowboys, they are. So at the point in time where the Cowboys can win a championship, then I can accept a 1-5 record against playoff teams but until then, it's an issue.

BTW, the Bucs were 4-0 last year in the post season, against playoff teams. That's what counts.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
No. In sports there are winners and losers. Somebody has to win and somebody has to lose.

If you're not a winner then you are the loser. That's with any player. You can have a HOF career, but if you didn't win a championship then you are not a winner.

Again, you don't have to agree, and it's okay for us to have different opinions on it.
Click to expand...
OK I said I wouldn’t discuss it but I have to ask a question. I can have a winning record. But if I don’t win a championship I’m a loser. That seems to be something that you would understand with your way of thinking
 
Whirlwin said:
Yes someone Hass to win someone has to lose. Tennis baseball football. It still takes a team behind you. But if you win it doesn’t make you a winner. Just like if you lose. There’s a lot more that goes into being a winner then winning something. That’s life that’s more than sports . So I totally without a doubt totally totally totally disagreed. With your analogy of winning and losing. I actually feel bad that you don’t understand what it really means to be a winner.I lost the tennis match. I must be a loser. For that moment or life in general. Either way you’re not a loser. You just scored less points
Click to expand...
If you lost the tennis match, then yes, you are the loser of that tennis match.

If you lose a boxing match then you are the loser and the other person is the winner.

I'm not saying you are a loser in life, but somebody has to win the game and somebody else has to lose. That's just how sports are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 86 more.
Total: 1,806 (members: 186, guests: 1,620)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,310
Messages
13,865,259
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top