I have not seen anything to confirm this.....or was this just wishful thinking?Now the NFL is unsuspending Hill and making it a fine.
He should have been cut immediately after this unwarranted attack that took place AFTER the game. You got punched in the mouth during the game by the Raiders and then after the game you want to act all tuff and throw a haymaker at an unsuspecting player. Cut or Release, send a message to these over hyped, over paid, underachievers....................
Or was provoked after the game and just reactedOne word - premeditation.
Hill waited until after the game and planned his attack.
Or was provoked after the game and just reacted
Yea just choke him instead the NFL does not seem to mind that.It's simple. Don't want suspensions? Don't sucker punch a guy.
Technically, Trysten has a legit beef:So apparently he thinks if you apologize for assaulting a player after a game its no harm no foul.
It buys a game until JJ's "reinforcements" ride into town.
LOL, like Matt Dillion on Gunsmoke.
I was thinking uncle Jed Jones from Beverly Hillbillies.
I'm sure he doesn't believe that.. But he does believe he has a right to this process and likely got a call from the NFLPA advising him to do it. Because two games if F ing heavy handed for a head slap.
It was better in the 60's and 70's when throwing punches was just part of the game
I miss the days of hearing the announcer say both benches are empty when both teams hit the field for a brawlLOL, the only thing wrong was he didn't body him and follow it up with a left uppercut...and keep your freaking helmet on knucklehead. This guy just seems to find ways to avoid playing time.
I disagree. Fine him, but unless players get suspended every time they try landing a haymaker, then no. And it's a fact that the officiating is grossly inconsistent.